Register Now!
 
LOG IN  |  SIGN UP
33

Experiment: To get busted in flagrante delicto, and I mean IN flagrante. My special friend, Ms. Inimitables, and I are going to be going at it when the door opens, and someone is going to be treated to quite an eyeful.

Hypothesis: Adding the possibility of getting caught to the otherwise delightful act of copulating is a little like sprinkling one's popcorn with paprika: not necessary — but definitely nice. But knowing you're going to get caught — well, that's a drizzle of sweet cream butter. Or so I assume...

Materials:
• Willing partner: in this case, Ms. Inimitables
• Restaurant bathroom, door unlocked
• Unsuspecting intruder

Method: Getting busted having sex is typically no more difficult than "helping" your friend babysit, accidentally leaving your dorm-room door unlocked, or failing to notice workmen on the rooftop outside your window. In such situations, it pays simply to discontinue pistoning (without extraction), then wave and smile with the nonchalance of a sous chef seen chiffonading parsley. But intending to get caught is a slightly different matter. It requires discussion, anticipation, and planning — and, for me at least, elicits all the Hooksexups of any public, penis-related performance.

When I raised the question with Ms. Inimitables of when and where we were going to be discovered, we struggled to find consensus. For some reason her parents' bed was deemed off-limits, as were her office, Central Park, the DMV, and the Disney Store.

Getting busted having sex is typically no more difficult than leaving your dorm-room door unlocked or failing to notice workmen outside your window.

But then she turned the tables, accusing me of trying to take the easy way out, for apparently it wasn't enough that a Latino family from the building next to mine gazed in on us last week during a bit of pretzel logic. Seen, yes, but clearly only for shame — not for science.

A few days later, Ms. Inimitables conveniently had a triathlon to race on Staten Island, and I thought, what better place to get busted than on the ferry back, under the approving eye of Lady Libertine? Sadly, though, the ferry was so crowded and had such giant restrooms, there was no good way to sneak her into the men's. Coitus interruptus impossibilus.

Then I remembered the Metro North railway with its (I long ago noticed) massive single-toilet restrooms with sliding doors that are notoriously hard to lock. (I've walked on a number of people mid-squat. No one was ever pleased.) Inquiring minds want to know, why, Mr. Train Car Designer, did you make the bathroom stalls larger than my Manhattan bedroom if you didn't want me to transfer some of the activity of the latter into the former? I consider the design a tacit mandate from the Budd company.

So Ms. Inimitables and I began doing the thing we like to do, with her leaning up against the metal sink and me doing my best imitation of an ornamental cloak. We did it, and we did it, and we made noise, and we made sure the door was unlocked, and no one came (uh, by which I mean to say, no one tried to enter), and we kept doing it, and still no one came (and not doing so was becoming increasingly difficult for one member of the constituency), but still no knocking, no busting, no discovery, no jail time. With Ms. Inimitables, a mortal man can only hold himself back so long. So finally, we returned to our seats, blushing madly but feeling like two hands that had clapped in the forest.

A little more research and I found the perfect spot to try again: an historical Manhattan bar/restaurant famous for its burgers, with upstairs seating and stall bathrooms at the back, the last one co-ed. So two nights later, a few beers and a disc of cow in each of us, we trundled to the back, giggling, ready to get amorous.

Comments ( 33 )

This isn't an expression of sexual freedom, it's forcing others to participate in your sexual acts. That's not just my opinion, but also advice columnist Dan Savage (whose column is carried by Hooksexup). This is no different than a lone man flashing his penis to young girls on a subway. Hooksexup wouldn't be publishing a story about how you went out to assault women in public restrooms, so why are they publishing stories about exposure. Hell, the fine print on the bottom of this page reads, "We are ardently committed to free expression, but we do expect Hooksexup visitors and contributors to interact respectfully and responsibly. Blatant expressions of bigotry, sexism or hatred may be constitutionally protected on the street corner, but they're not cool here." I'd say this shit crossed that line. You're damn lucky you weren't caught by a mom with her eight year old because then you be likely facing some jail time or even having to register as a low-level sex offender.

gm commented on Jul 08 09 at 4:31 pm

i agree with gm above me. your "experiment" just glorifies sexual misconduct and indecent exposure. of course you may just putter around about how "uncool" and "prudish" we are, but justifying it for science-as a scientist, shame on you.

jw commented on Jul 08 09 at 4:54 pm

the above respondents are uncool and prudish

gb commented on Jul 08 09 at 5:57 pm

I agree with jw and gm. I'm cool and unprudish, but I don't like others sexuality to be imposed upon me.

jl commented on Jul 08 09 at 9:08 pm

to me, the whole thing just came across as two people desperately in need of some attention. pretty sad, actually.

sh commented on Jul 08 09 at 9:19 pm

Good lord. Hooksexup just keeps getting sadder. I'm not even going to say anything about the vacuous, straining writing in this piece. Spontaneously getting caught, yes, is lovely, and who among the least adventurous of us hasn't gotten caught--in a restaurant bathroom (or more inventive places). But planning it--you're right--means all sorts of manufacturing. So what the hell was your point? You and your girlfriend were all nervous and got caught. Big deal.
If the writing, the angle of the piece, had had some measure of depth, this might have been an adequate piece.
Instead....more simplistic, trying-to-be-funny/hip, pulp writing from Hooksexup.
(I remember the good old days.)

dw commented on Jul 08 09 at 10:00 pm

Great piece, highly entertaining. Everyone is so PC complaining here. This was informative, I've never done this and now I feel like I have a sense of what it feels like. Mission accomplished.

pop commented on Jul 09 09 at 1:12 am

I agree with the majority, here; sexual freedom entails sexual responsibility. Dick move, assholes.

DL commented on Jul 09 09 at 1:13 am

oh no! "sexual misconduct"!

pfl commented on Jul 09 09 at 10:26 am

"I was one of the first to speak out against horse play."tm

gb commented on Jul 09 09 at 11:04 am

Have done similar acts in a motel with the Venetian blinds slightly open, and on a hi-rise hotel balcony facing other balconies, at sunset. In both cases, signed in under false ID and left shortly after being seen.

MG commented on Jul 09 09 at 5:30 pm

Involving others in your sexual exploits without their consent is assholery, not daring or cool. And abiding by some sort of standards about conduct in public is not prudery, it's courtesy, or just plain decency.

jl commented on Jul 09 09 at 7:08 pm

I am absolutely apalled and disgusted by this piece.You laugh off the possibility of a child walking in on you,as if that would have been merely,what? More uncomfortable? Awkward for the parent? As a child I was terrified by my mother fucking whoever and wherever she wanted.And yes,I mean IN THE SAME ROOM AS ME! You cannot underestimate the effect this can have on someone who HAS NO IDEA WHAT IS HAPPENING.The first time it happened,I thought he was killing her.In front of me.I am 35 years old now,and I still hate her for exposing me to her so-called "sexuality".You really hit a raw Hooksexup with me here.I think I will stay away from this site for a while.

tt commented on Jul 09 09 at 10:49 pm

huh...hopefully those who disliked this piece on the grounds that it exposes and engages others in the act without their consent have been equally outraged and have taken the same level of action against their government of the last eight years for being made unwitting/unwilling accomplices to all manners of crimes against humanity. I mean, c'mon, it just sex, fer cri-yi. It's how we all got here, right? Well maybe not that guy over there...obviously beamed aboard spaceship earth without an owners's manual...

bb commented on Jul 10 09 at 12:48 pm

I've been caught by cops in a jacuzzi of an apartment complex in Tempe, AZ - I didn't live there. That was embarrassing. I did it in the bathroom of a bar on 14th Street, and then on a rooftop on Mott... but I agree - it's just sex. For fuck's sake.

pw commented on Jul 10 09 at 8:59 am

I am seriously going to stop reading Hooksexup next week if you don't stop letting this guy write every other article.

lj commented on Jul 10 09 at 11:37 am

If my 5 year old daughter had opened that door, I want you to know that I would have beaten the living shit out of you in the parking lot. This isn't some adults having consensual sex. When you deliberately drag a random stranger, who could easily be a child, into your sex act without their consent, you are a sex offender. And your kind is anathema in our society. I say this as someone who has been reading Hooksexup for the last 7 years and is open to pretty much any sex act between consenting adults.

If this is 'the new Hooksexup,' I'm done with you. I've literally bought the t-shirt and paid for a subscription in the past. What's your next column? Frotting a 7th grader in a crowd on the subway? Raping a homeless heroin addict? You just crossed a line and left the sex-positive community.

JL commented on Jul 10 09 at 1:40 pm

This thrill is the same thrill that motivates the guy who flashes people in the park - even for a mere "1/4 second". We call him a sex offender. This was both pitiable and offensive.

pb commented on Jul 10 09 at 5:01 pm

I like the idea of I Did It For Science: Sex Offender. Great idea pb.

pity commented on Jul 10 09 at 11:15 pm

So you all come to a website about sex and culture and then you just expose how puritanical you still are about sex.

rem commented on Jul 12 09 at 5:21 pm

How to get the thrill without exposing children: do it in a 21-and-over venue. Another way to avoid offending the unsuspecting: try a nude beach with a reputation for sexual activity. You might get a little less of a kick if your audience isn't totally unsuspecting, but you won't be harming anyone, and it's still damn hot.

dlt commented on Jul 12 09 at 11:29 pm

Sharing a private moment? Or imposing a private moment? Wrong venue, in my opinion. Try an adult book store, perhaps? That is somewhere in which the other (adult) punters might just expect to interrupt a couple in flagrante delicto.

JR commented on Jul 13 09 at 9:14 pm

Everyone wants interesting articles, but then complains about a little f***ing for science. Shame shame. I think it's all in good fun. I'm sure there's far less attractive people having sex in public places all over NYC at any given time. Kudos for the bravery.

SH commented on Jul 13 09 at 9:36 pm

Well why don't you try being a rapist for science? No? Okay, then we all agree that there are boundaries - we're just arguing over where they should be. So it's not a prudes vs. libertines thing, but rather a matter of exactly how far is too far. Honestly, what would you have done if a child had opened that door?

DT commented on Jul 14 09 at 3:10 pm

again, folks, it was a bar, and if for some reason there actually had been any children present (there or on the train), we would have picked another time/place. i assure you, we're not monsters.

jh commented on Jul 14 09 at 7:33 pm

sorry, forgot to sign that last post. -- jack harrison

jh commented on Jul 14 09 at 7:33 pm

People have sex in bar bathrooms every single night in New York City. Implying that these people are criminals for doing so would be like implying that people doing cocaine in the same bathrooms are criminals.

bjc commented on Jul 15 09 at 7:46 am

Really terrible writing here guys.

FU commented on Jul 15 09 at 1:52 pm

Jack, it seem that getting caught in the midst WITH someone has the twinge of the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve damn the fig-leaves vibe to it. Getting busted when one is alone (Fast Times at Ridegemont High: "Doesn't anyone knock anymore") is another matter though. Not fun.

DK commented on Jul 16 09 at 3:28 pm

JL if I saw you send your 5 year old daughter to the bathroom by herself in a bar full of drunkards, I'd call DCPS and beat the shit out of you. High fucking horse, dude. Mighty fucking high.

DK commented on Jul 16 09 at 3:33 pm

Does anyone else miss Rev?

CM commented on Jul 20 09 at 12:40 pm

Well how he says it was a bar. Seems like it was a restaurant before, and he's the one who brought up the 8-year-old first. Bit too late to ignore it now. As someone who's into any number of kinky consensual things, I agree with the posters who say this is not very different from the guy exposing himself on the subway. If your kink is exhibitionism and you want people to watch you have sex, go to a sex club, that's what they're for. Unless you're too chicken to really commit, obviously.

SG commented on Jul 20 09 at 1:09 pm

Yes, its 'indecent' and yes this sort of thing stands the risk of offending someone with an incredibly fragile sensibility, but come on! How can anyone as squeemish as this group end up on a site like Hooksexup anyway? Its a SEX site, this couple had SEX in a public washroom - and holy cow with the paranoia about small children catching wind of sex in public. I remember growing up and thinking quite the opposite of stumbling upon sex - it was confusing and foreign but ultimately those early discoveries led to the growing curiousity that I have today. It is one thing to intentionally have sex on front of your children as a parent, and another for a child to see a fraction of a second of the act. Thats life. So mention the dirty deed a little early.

ps: I really loved your writing. Don't worry about the zealots. You will note that nearly all "I Did it for Science" articles recieve a similar barrage of hate mail. Go figure.

TP commented on Oct 27 09 at 11:04 pm

Leave a Comment