Register Now!

     

     

    As someone who makes books her hobby and livelihood, I cringed at the idea of helping to elevate the profile of Mikita Brottman's new cultural critique, The Solitary Vice: Against Reading. I've spent my life shelving, conserving and binding books. I even worked as a freelance letterpress printer, setting type by hand in the half-millenium-old tradition of Johannes Gutenberg. And here comes Brottman, declaring all those beautiful, dusty, leather-bound volumes less important than the tripe we give an hourly refresh during our workday.

    From the time we were old enough to decipher Goodnight Moon without parental assistance, we've been taught that reading books is a lofty pursuit. Now, enthusiasm for that pursuit appears to be waning. The New Yorker recently wrung its hands over a 2002 study by the National Endowment for the Arts that showed less than half of Americans had read a book in the past twelve months — the lowest percentage since the survey was first conducted twenty-five years ago. Yet Brottman, who has a PhD in English Language and Literature from Oxford University, is unconcerned. Despite her own book's title, she doesn't believe people should stop reading. In fact, she says we're reading more than ever — websites, email, text messages, blogs — and that this type of reading is more valuable than an unhappy slog through The Iliad. She spoke to Hooksexup about why the decline of book culture is nothing to mourn, the joy of tabloids and the sex appeal of librarians. — Kate Ray

      Send to a Friend
      Printer Friendly Format
      Leave Feedback
      Read Feedback
      Hooksexup RSS
    promotion

    Since I've worked in books, the subtitle "Against Reading" provoked an instant reaction.
    I'd wanted to just call it The Solitary Vice, and the publisher wanted to include "Against Reading". I felt it was kind of a Trojan horse, because it's not really against reading at all.

    Right, it's more that it takes issue with the idea that reading books will turn us all into good, upstanding citizens.
    Yeah, and that reading has become an unassailable virtue, and you simply can't attack it. That's like saying walking is a virtue, without regard to where you're going or why you're going there.

    But you point out that as a culture, we're reading more than ever — just not books.
    People assume that if you're not actually sitting with a book in your lap, you're not really reading. Whereas most of what people are doing online is reading. Sending text messages or sitting with a magazine or a comic is reading. There are all kinds of reading, and I think book-boostering campaigns are a reaction against these things that compete for our attention. People feel anxious about the demise of reading, but those anxieties are groundless, and perhaps rooted in snobbery.

    It's a very Catholic guilt, this worry about whether we're reading "the right things."
    And whether we're getting too much pleasure out of reading, as though if we really enjoy it then we're not learning from it, that it should be a struggle, it should be difficult, and we should just plow on with something even if we're not particularly engaged in it. So many of the people I talked to said they had real difficulty putting a book down even if they were not enjoying it at all.

    It's true. For every tabloid I read, I feel the need to balance it by reading a real book.
    [Laughs] As though it's going to cancel out the dirt you've put in your mind.

    Who's benefiting from this idea that literature is the only valuable thing to read?
    People who feel they've struggled with the classics and gained from them and were educated by them. It's a barometer of anxiety. And they have this idea that reading is a communal activity, that it can be done in book clubs, it can be done by everyone in the city reading the same book, it can be a way of bringing people together and out of their isolation. But I think more people have had my experience than otherwise: that reading has isolated them from the community and damaged their social gifts.

    What do you mean by social gifts?
    In my experience, and in the experience of many of my students, if you're from a family that doesn't read a lot, you can develop a very complex and textured inner language. Your spoken language is more simple and straightforward. When you read these very complex ideas, you can lose the ability to communicate with people around you.

    Do you see the rise of memoirs and blogs as a product of people moving toward things that feel more relatable?
    Possibly, but I think there's always been an interest in memoir. It's just that now that reading is seen as a virtue in its own right, I think some people feel memoir is the easiest way into that virtue — the easiest thing to write, and the easiest thing to read. It's still sort of a book, and it has all the virtues of a book. It's like a novel without all the scaffolding surrounding it.

    One of my favorite parts of your book was about how books themselves have become fetish objects that have little to do with reading. I just moved across the country, and I shipped all my books out here, and when I unpacked them I had this moment of, What am I doing this for?
    I think the less we need books, the more people fetishize them, and those people are not necessarily great readers. Everyone seems to believe it's more virtuous and admirable to collect rare editions than to collect teapots or something, but really, it's one kind of fetish or the other.

    Do you think there's a growing resentment of being well-read, that it's becoming less of a desirable trait?
    Like a backlash? I'm not sure I've noticed that, but I do think it's true now that people tend to judge one another less by their set of collective references than they used to. If I refer to a Shakespeare character and someone doesn't know what I'm talking about, I'm not going to count that as a strike against them. In the past, there was more of a shared set of references that every Westerner had. It's much more fragmented now. There are so many different cultural frames of reference that there's less elitism, less of a sense that one is superior to the other.

    Now I have a question for you. I noticed when I was researching this book that librarians are considered cool and sexy these days. Have you noticed that?

    Yeah, actually. When I tell people I was a librarian they're like, "Ooh, tell me what goes on in the stacks." I think it has something to do with, as libraries start to lack usefulness, the librarian becomes seen as a keeper of these sacred book objects. It gives us a certain allure.  

     

    To order The Solitary Vice: Against Reading,
    click here.

    RELATED ARTICLES
    Life Swap by Will Doig
    Author Tim Guest befriends terrorists, escorts and mafia hitman in the virtual world.
    Anti Matters by Will Doig
    Britain's novelist of rebellion Hari Kanzru tackles the '60s culture wars.
    Man vs. Machine by Sarah Harrison
    A new book explores the idea of human-on-robot hookups.
    Brut Force by Catrinel Bartolomeu
    An expert on "smell psychology" claims the fragrance industry has ruined modern mating.
    Vice Patrol by Will Doig
    NPR quiz-show host Peter Sagal delves into a world of blackjack and wife-swapping.
    Purity Test by Will Doig
    Tom Perrotta gets inside the evangelical mind in The Abstinence Teacher.
    Love Thy Stunt Memoir by Nicole Pasulka
    A.J. Jacobs on his Year of Living Biblically.

    ©2008 hooksexup.com and Kate Ray

    Commentarium (6 Comments)

    Apr 03 08 - 8:04pm
    ASM

    I agreed with the broad thesis of this author but this set of statements struck as ill thought out and probably just play wrong. She should run them by a linguist.
    "In my experience, and in the experience of many of my students, if you're from a family that doesn't read a lot, you can develop a very complex and textured inner language. Your spoken language is more simple and straightforward. When you read these very complex ideas, you can lose the ability to communicate with people around you."
    In my experience, people who read a lot actually are quite a bit better at communicating with other people than those who don't. I'm not sure what she's basing this idea on but in any case, the plural of anecdote is not evidence.

    Apr 09 08 - 1:59am
    LC

    I find this interview and the content of "A Solitary Vice" highly disturbing. Her ideas aren't revolutionary but rather help to rationalize the distinctly American phenomenon of anti-intellectualism. It is no coincidence that poorly substantiated books like this are being published and actually taken somewhat seriously, in a time in which some public school systems are beginning to teach creationism, etc. go ahead and make yourself feel better for "reading" txt messages and blogs rather than literature with the authors ridiculous claims. what evidence is there that those who read are less able to communicate clearly with their peers?

    May 10 08 - 4:25pm
    BK

    Boo hoo hoo, books ruined my life. If Brottman didn't have books to blame for her life, she'd be blaming her parents. For heavens sake don't let her turn on the TV or she may jump out the window thinking she's "Spider Chick" Get a clue Brottman you read fiction. It's now real! I can't believe she actually teaches. Read some non-fiction and grow-up.

    May 11 08 - 2:37pm
    ts

    I hope Mikita Brottman had a better copy editor than was evidenced in the excerpt in The Week magazine ... wherein she states that Catherine mourned Heathcliff's death in Wuthering Heights. In fact, it was the other way around. Catherine died, leaving Heathcliff to mourn.

    Apr 06 09 - 6:48am
    NRB

    "Anything" Mikita Brottman writes is "suspect", the very moment she's identified as the author!! In its' accuracy and substance. Usually her written work has as much truth as an AIG Bank Spokesman's press release!!! The second her name comes up, I start vigorously tapping "ice berg ahead" on the telegraphy key, hoping the majority of sensible and logical people will listen to my warning.............No matter how harshly I speak of this poor ignorant creature, it still doesn't do her true justice!! I suppose I should feel more sorrow than anything else for such a pitiful excuse for a person. Who sadly thinks of themselves as an upstanding intellectual, author, and College Professor. But, in truth is nothing more than a Pseudo-Intellectual Hate Monger!!! Yes, you heard me right I called her a hate monger. Which until she issues a true heart felt apology to all of us in the "Aspie Community", she will continue to be!..........I'll get straight to the point. How she refers to all of us who happen to have "Asperger's Syndrome" in her widely read newspaper article "Nutty Professors" is the same as Hitler's reference to the Jews in "Mein Kampff"!! This is not an exaggeration in comparisons! She truly hates or at least has severe contempt for any and all who have Asperger's, just because she associates "us" with a couple of people she doesn't like.......Please do a search for her name and the a fore mentioned article ; "Nutty Professor's" and decide for yourself. Everything she claims about us is indeed hateful, untrue, bigoted, and generally ignorant!!.. All of her work, regardless of subject matter usually depends on personal speculation, being stated as if it's without question a concluded fact. She regularly inflates matters and outright lies if it suits her opinion....Bill O'Reily, Rush Limbaugh, and Newt Gingrich could learn something from her on how to tell a lie like it's the truth and make the masses believe it to be true!!....Whatever the case please read "Nutty Professor's" by "Mikita Brottman" and decide for yourself and please pass the word onto others to do the same. If anybody is as angry as I am about her. Then write an angry letter to her place of employment. Which I think is some college I've never heard of before in Santa Barbera, called "Pacifica" and demand she write a retraction or risk being proved publicly a prejudiced hate mongor, who has no right to be a professor at "any" learning institution!!

    Aug 09 10 - 1:28pm
    chief iron knee

    wouldn't it be more prudent to release this as an audio tape, or some other format that's not in printed form?