Register Now!

     DISPATCHES


      

         




    promotion


       Some viewers have sued the theater chains that run the ads, alleging that delaying the start of movie trailers until twenty minutes past the posted show time constitutes false advertising. But the ads aren't going away. Cinema advertising is an increasingly lucrative source of revenue, with sales up forty-eight percent in 2004. The theaters that haven't succumbed to the trend Anschutz started are having trouble surviving, says Jason Thompson, director of Captive Motion Picture Audience of America, an organization that protests theater advertising.
       Where advertising and programming were once left to theater managers, Anschutz now has centralized control of every Regal Theater through its proprietary Digital Content Network. Anschutz has also bought up television ad time and billboards for his "For a Better Life" campaign, which emphasizes values such as "faith" and "integrity," sometimes promoting them with Disney characters such as Kermit the Frog and Shrek. While the campaign is not explicitly religious, it does offer unsolicited moral advice to movie patrons at Regal's 6,000 screens. The ads were produced by Bonneville Communications, a Salt Lake City agency that produces ads for the Mormon Church.
        In 2005, PG-rated films outperformed R-rated films in the theater for the first time in two decades. Conservatives have touted weak theater attendance as proof that the heartland isn't interested in Hollywood's

    As a financial backer of Ray, Anschutz reportedly insisted on altering the details of subject Ray Charles' life, downplaying his drug use and womanizing to obtain a PG-13 rating.

    licentiousness and liberal politics. The Dove Foundation, non-profit advocates of "wholesome family entertainment", published a study showing that G-rated movies are eleven times more profitable than R-rated flicks. Indeed: as a co-producer and financial backer of Oscar contender Ray, Anschutz reportedly insisted on altering the details of subject Ray Charles' life, downplaying his drug use and womanizing to obtain a PG-13 rating.
       Although Hollywood didn't heed the Dove Foundation's advice in 2005 — the key Oscar nominations were all low-grossing films that are very political
    — studios have begun looking into releasing PG versions of their R-rated fare, an innovation made possible by the advent of digital cinema. The double release would allow theaters to play the cleaner version during more lucrative screening times earlier in the day, and the director's cut later on.
       What's good for the theater lobby isn't necessarily good for those of us who don't want our entertainment censored. Yet there is no shortage of screenwriters willing to lend Hollywood's product a cleaner sensibility. In December, the Atlantic Monthly reported on Christian screenwriting school Act One, whose faculty includes producers and writers from mainstream shows like Buffy the Vampire
    Slayer and That '70s Show. In 2004, conservatives launched the Liberty Film Festival; last October the festival included a panel discussion titled, "Was Communism a Threat to Hollywood?"
        Perhaps the more pressing question: is Hollywood ready to compensate exhibitors by eschewing edgy politics for movies with a built-in audience? A sequel — or, more accurately, prequel — to The Passion of the Christ is rumored. New Line Cinema is producing The Nativity, a film based on the life of Mary and Joseph, directed by Catherine Hardwicke (Thirteen, Lords of Dogtown). The End of the Spear tells the story of five missionaries whose families forgive the South American tribe that killed them.
       Fears of a boycott of one of the year's most eagerly anticipated releases, The Da Vinci Code, has Sony Pictures mounting a public relations campaign among evangelicals and Catholics. Madea's Family Reunion, which recently opened at the top of the box office, is a comedy about an African-American Christian fundamentalist family, whose evangelical producer Tyler Perry has, according to the L.A. Times, helped sell studio heads on the African-American Christian film market. Besides working on the Narnia franchise, Anschutz's Walden Media is releasing Amazing Grace, a biopic of the Christian revivalist William Wilberforce.
       Anschutz may well see himself as someone like Wilberforce, the wealthy merchant's son whose embrace of evangelical Christianity led him to fight to abolish the British slave trade. Wilberforce, however, was open about his intentions. Anschutz may better resemble another openly conservative Presbyterian, one who acquired his own vertically integrated empire of newspapers, film studios, and television stations years before anyone realized he would turn those media outlets into his personal political mouthpiece. That man was Rupert Murdoch.  



      

         













    ©2006 Justin Clark and hooksexup.com

    Comments ( 10 )

    Mar 23 06 at 5:37 pm
    DVW

    I am no fan of conservative excess of recent vintage. However, the article on Anshutz seems to presuppose that mainstream movies should not have any Christian focus. In other words, it supposes that film is a "zero sum" game in which Christian-themed movies signal the end of more edgy, secular entertainment. The tone of the piece, in all fairness, hints of "anti-Christian" prejudice, a frequent source of evengelical angst. Pieces like this suggest that such prejudices are about the only issue where the evangelicals may have a point.

    Mar 23 06 at 7:18 pm
    JS

    Mr. Clark,

    I do not understand the harm here. So what if a few big media companies are owned by conservatives? What about the vast majority of the rest, such as Time Warner (which includes CNN), Viacom and Disney (ABC)? Good god and good grief. Silly, sophmoric and narrow minded.

    Mar 25 06 at 3:10 pm
    AI

    I don't think the two previous correspondents have actually understood the threat here. The article is exposing the practices of someone who is aiming to limit the available movies to those that he deems acceptable. So what if there are other companies, they too can be subjected to these kind of pressures and lo, you have complete diet of "wholesome family fare" whether you want it or not.

    Mar 27 06 at 3:52 am
    mb

    Shrek and Kermit are NOT Disney characters ...

    Mar 29 06 at 6:20 pm
    JR

    There are two Regal complexes within 5 miles of my house. For over three months the Chronicles of Narmia was on two screens in those theatres, starting every half hour, playing about 8 times a day at each theater. On the other hand, Brokeback Mountain played one screen at each cinema starting only three or four times a day at the same time at each theater for about 3 weeks. Thus, while these two regent theaters gave Narmia about 3,000 showings. Brokeback mountain was limited to less than 300 showings. It is not surprising that Narmia made 4 times the money that Brokeback Mountain did when the theaters gave audience every possible opportunity to see Narmia and virtually no opportunity to see Brokeback Mountain. We should keep in mind that while Narmia made back 2 times its investment, Brokeback mountain made back 7 times its investment.

    Mar 29 06 at 11:16 pm
    JDM

    This is the EVIL company that bought out Litchfield Company of SC, the company I worked 20 years for. When Regal found out I was gay they were the ones that drove me crazy by firing my staff and putting in their own to spy on me and find any little thing to get me on. I could go on and on about these jerks. In the end I had to quit. They haven't changed a damn bit!

    Mar 30 06 at 2:34 am
    PS

    The more censorship, the less democracy.
    The more democracy, the less censorship.
    True or False?

    So, in Communist Red China, which has a highly censored society, do they have a democracy? No. In fact, the Commie Red Chinese censor from their media and airwaves the exact same things that the religious fundamentalists are trying to censor from American media and airwaves.

    So, if censorship is a sign of a anti-democratic Communist police state, then those people out to censor the same things the Communists censor must be out to impose a anti-democratic police state on all those citizens unfortunate to be in the same society with them...and religion is just a smokescreen to hide their nefarious plans.

    Therefore, who's calling for increased levels of censorship in the United States? Aren't these people anti-democracy, and really Communists, or at least totalitarian Communist sympathizers who share the same Communist mindset?

    I'll repeat, censorship is a sign of a monopolistic dictator. And for censorship to be promoted in the United States indicates someone is out to destroy our democracy, especially with our unique Bill of Rights, and set up their Communist-styled censorship society.

    And I don't care if Citizen Anschutz or Rupert Murdoch claim they are Christians...I know a Communist by watching for someone displaying signs of censorship. And it's not just Anschutz and Murdoch who are behind this evil attempt to takeover our democratic society and turn us into their slaves. The top officials at Clear Channel Communications are also in on the plot. Alberto Gonzales, with his secret, illegal wiretap campaign, is another. The entire leadership of the so-called Christian Coalition are involved in this evil plot. Oh, wait, they are righteous. And righteous folks are never wrong, at least in their minds.

    But what about Jesus Christ? What would he do? Would he join with Citizen Anschutz, Rupert Murdoch or any of the other self-described so-called Christians who are out to censor liberty and freedom in our democracy? Hardly.

    Remember, Jesus was the one censored. He was not the one doing the censoring. Jesus was the one scourged. He was not the one doing the scourging. Jesus was the one put to death. He was not the one with a belief in the death penalty.

    So, the right-wing Christian fanatics can go on claiming they are Christian, but I know the difference. And calling them Communists more fully describes their goal for America. Censorship. Censorship. Censorship. And only a God-forsaking, Christ-forsaking dictator censors. Which means these righteous wingnuts are hardly Christian.

    Apr 01 06 at 4:15 pm
    ASP

    Hi -- I'm sure this is just a typo, but the British Christian crusader against the slave trade wasn't Wilbur but William Wilberforce.

    Apr 02 06 at 9:06 pm
    ted

    scary. why is it the religious right is intent upon marching us all back to nursery school? its a wonder that they procreate.

    Oct 31 10 at 4:16 am
    mauk insurance

    Porfirio, WTF???

    https://insuranceaudio.info

    Add a Comment

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

    A recent graduate of the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, Justin Clark has written for L.A. Weekly, Psychology Today, Black Book, Architecture, Fuse, and The Fader, among other publications. He is currently researching a history of the American child prodigy, and writing a mystery novel set in Los Angeles.