Register Now!
LOG IN  |  SIGN UP
19
 PERSONAL ESSAYS




The Lug in Winter


promotion

Only minutes into the season premiere of The Real World: Austin, two hot, drunk girls changed into their bikinis, jumped in the hot tub, and made out. Geez. Back in my day, girls waited at least till sweeps week. I guess those were simpler times then — remember back in 1994, when conservatives got their panties in a wad over that bloodless kiss on Roseanne? It's hard to even remember the controversy now that girl-on-girl kissing has become as much a frat-boy cliché as the keg stand. There must have been some argument about moral values and network standards, but that of course crumbled under the vast realization that, dude, two girls kissing is hotttt. In the eleven years since Roseanne Conner first locked lips with Mariel Hemingway, girls kissing each other has practically become a rite of passage for zeitgeist television shows: from Ally McBeal to Buffy the Vampire Slayer to The O.C. Hell, even The Gilmore Girls got some action. And we hardly need mention MTV, whose 2003 Music Awards included Madonna's infamous kiss with Britney (oh, and someone named Christina) as well as an underage Sapphic tribute à la Tatu, the Russian lesbians who turned out to be little more than clueless Slavic girls playing a role for a buck. That's a fairly good metaphor for what the girl-on-girl kiss has become — once a symbol of female experimentation and empowerment, it is now mostly another way to turn guys on. When The Real World has two (attached) women hitting it before the second commercial break, you know the girl-on-girl kiss has finally jumped the shark.
    Things were different when I first kissed a girl. My story is fairly typical: I was twenty years old, and drunk, and at a party, and the tale of how my friend Carolyn went from lying beside me to having her tongue inside my mouth is not the first story lost to Jack Daniel's. She and I had been cuddling and

How Carolyn's tongue got inside my mouth is not the first story lost to Jack Daniel's.

fondling each other's hair on the couch, and the kiss seemed almost a natural extension of that behavior. Later, after I sobered up, it was a little astonishing; I was a good Texas girl with childhood dreams of Johnny Depp and River Phoenix. But the most astonishing part was how good that kiss was — soft and warm and shot full with longing. Ten years later, it is still one of the best kisses I've ever had. So it shouldn't surprise you that, later that year, Carolyn and I wound up naked in bed together after a friend's wedding. I don't remember much of that, either, but I do recall it was wicked fun.
    Did I worry that I was lesbian? I did not. My sexual experiences with men were too vast, and pleasurable, to even consider their future sacrifice. Besides, by then such experimentation had become accepted, even trendy, among my weirdo liberal arts friends. And while I did find myself pricked with longing whenever Carolyn wore a particularly tight pair of white flared pants . . . well, who wouldn't? The girl had serious gams. Around that time, I messed around with a few other girlfriends in the name of curiosity and bourbon. It never went much of anywhere. It was just something that happened at parties when girls were feeling naughty, like a college game of "Doctor." Although I was not familiar with the term at the time, I suspect I qualify for at least partial membership in the group commonly termed "LUG" — lesbian until graduation. Like my sisters in that sorority, I decided post-college that I preferred the company of men between the sheets. (Interestingly, my longtime roommate decided, somewhat to my surprise, that she vastly preferred women.) But I don't regret the experiences at all. They were so bound up with the chaos and revolution of that time, the fumbling discovery of my own female superpowers — to seduce, to shun, to choose whatever, and whomever, I wanted. When Carolyn and I kissed at that party, the boys in the room went weak-kneed, but that didn't matter; what mattered is that we did.
    So the pervasiveness of this girl-on-girl kissing makes me a little sad. Sure it has the veneer of progressive politics, but isn't it all just heterosexual male fantasy disguised as empowerment? A new kind of pole dance? I

"We call those 'party bisexuals,'" she said, crinkling her nose.

recently asked a twenty-one-year-old friend and recent NYU graduate about the whole thing. Had she heard of LUGs? No, she had not. What about girls who kiss other girls when they're drunk at parties?
   "Oh, we call those 'party bisexuals,'" she said, crinkling her nose. "We just kind of roll our eyes at them."
    My friend, Andrea, had gone to an arts program where many of her friends were proudly queer or transgendered. Some of them had been out as early as middle school, and the sight of two women kissing for the delectation of the male gaze was not exciting but, rather, sickening. Maybe it's because actually coming out — actually wrestling with your sexual preferences and the expectations of others — can be so painful. Maybe it's because that kind of MTV exhibitionism is just tacky. Maybe it's because sorority girls lay claim to enough already — money, beauty, society's good will — so does it really seem fair they can roleplay lesbian, too?
   "I think you need to make a distinction between girls who kiss girls because it turns on guys, and girls who do it for other reasons." This is Rebecca, twenty-nine, who graduated from the University of Kansas after a history similar (if more robust) than mine. "Because for a lot of girls, this is about figuring out why I might be having these feelings, or why I'm having these dreams."
    Agreed. And though it's been a decade since I graduated, I'm certain earnest female experimentation is alive and throbbing in the hushed corridors of female dorms around the country. But I wonder: How would my experience with Carolyn be different if I were in college now? Would it be freer — or just more desperate? Carolyn and I were both notorious drunks, hungry for male attention, and our first hook-up probably had as much to do with curiosity as the sheer proximity of each other's willing lips. And yet, that moment seems like this integral part of my sexual development — lovely, unexpected, even vulnerable. Far be it for me to mourn the days of poor closeted Ellen, but I hate to think the girl-on-girl kiss could have just turned into a party trick.  






ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Sarah Hepola has been a high-school teacher, a playwright, a film critic, a music editor and a travel columnist. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, Slate, The Guardian, Salon, and on NPR. She lives in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.



    Click here to read other features from the Bisexuality Issue!



    Bisexuality: share your stories

 




©2005 Sarah Hepola and hooksexup.com

Comments ( 19 )

I don't understand what your point is, ms writer. Really, I don't. Someone explain please.
commented on Jul 21 05 at 2:26 am
it seems to me that we are all beset by the illusion that when we leave a building, it collapses behind us; when we leave a school, it goes to rot; and when we leave a stage of life or predeliction, it becomes cliched and unoriginal, or uninspiring. this is a healthy case of solipsism -- heck if thought all places and stages of life improved after our departure we would be rather depressed. i enjoyed this piece and liked the personal essay meets light polemic approach, but i suspect that to most people in the middle of a kiss, the cultural references are less important than Hooksexup responses and any number of other factors. i suspect the author may have been more motivated by a desire to intrigue boys, based on what she says, and young women today may be less exclusively interested in male attention than presumed. were i a college girl (i am a thiry something guy) i would see at as a two birds one stone opportunity -- thrash around with a hot chic AND increase the value of my stock in the marketplace, not a bad proposition. people may resent the good fortune of the bi-curious co-ed, unafflicted by the challenges of the exclusively gay or straight, but its hard to argue with her decision making process. as a guy, btw, i would be much more aroused by a woman who was genuinely bi-curious (however threatened by the prospet of my irrelevancy) than one posing as one ... attention mongering can be smelled from a considerable distance.
ted commented on Jul 21 05 at 7:34 am
Just, up front, I'm a bisexual woman. That said, I guess my problem with the whole "LUG" thing is that is seems to be reaping the benefits of a community, but not sharing in it's struggles. To make matters worse, it feeds a stereotype that puts other women in a position to be harassed at the very least and at most in a position of physical danger. Behavior like this reinforces the idea that lesbianism (or female bisexuality, even) doesn't have any further validity than to serve as sexual stimulation for men. Isn't there a better way to explore one's sexuality (if that truely is the case) than on display at parties?
ML commented on Jul 21 05 at 7:47 pm
Hmm, this essay is almost worse than the last one.
commented on Jul 22 05 at 12:11 pm
I hate LUGs and I hate BUGs and they deserve each other. Like Hooksexup lately deserving its really bad writers with their really predictable and dull stories with no real insights. Can you get more mainstream and male-centered from here Hooksexup? I think not. I am disappointed.
commented on Jul 22 05 at 1:21 am
great point ML
kgs commented on Jul 22 05 at 9:50 am
i won't even deal with the LUG issue here. I'm more bothered by the idea of the melancholic reflection on a mere ten years back (when you're only thirty) and the reference to 1994 as a time of "revolution" and "chaos." Maybe in other countries and about things that matter, but not a girl-on-girl kiss. It's just funny.
commented on Jul 22 05 at 11:45 am
I too am saddened by the role the female on female kiss has taken on, but for another reason. I'm a guy, and if I get drunk and want to fool around, everyone thinks its repulsive, at least, in my mostly hetero world they do. Women get it all these days. They can be with a woman while still being "serious" with their man. If I do something that turns me on, I'm a pervert, homo or cheater. When she does it it's just experimentation. If she can kiss other people that turn her on, then I should be able to also. So what if it makes her jealous or insecure.
NDO commented on Jul 22 05 at 4:37 pm
Very well written piece. I don't understand the criticism. I don';t think Sarah was making a case for ten years ago being a radical time socially or politically, but personally--as the late teens/early twenties often are for every generation. The prohbition for men is very much still there--and oppressive, but I sure enjoyed my ocassional romps with men back at that age.
BL commented on Jul 23 05 at 9:11 am
I agree with the sentiment that it's kind of laughable that this writer is reflecting on 1994 like it was 50 years ago. As for the article? What are you trying to say, author? "Even though I'm straight, I fooled around with girls in college. Some people think that's obnoxious. And, now that I think about it, I was a lush who desired male attention. Huh." Is Hooksexup so desperate for articles that this LiveJournal entry deserves to be published?
EVL commented on Jul 24 05 at 9:20 am
dear Hooksexup. please put the 'bisexuality issue' out of its misery. at this point i'd sooner read Cosmo than slog through yet another sophomore-year sexuality studies term paper masquerading as something worth reading.
qm commented on Jul 24 05 at 9:29 am
I think women should hold on to the freedom to engage in mutual sexual displays of affection with other women. Men don't have that freedom. A woman can "experiment" and "explore" with another woman, and not be labeled homosexual. Men simply can't claim to be exploring their sexuality, and they definitely can't do it in front of a party full of people.
TD commented on Jul 24 05 at 7:14 pm
TD, you are just another pervert. "Freedom", huh? I won't go into a whole feminist rant, but I just want to point out that this is a fake freedom that women have-- the "freedom" to show themselves weak and spineless in public while effectively using each other for the benefit of some nasty guy watching and leering in a corner. Disgusting. That's why I was hoping Hooksexup was going to have the decency to post something about genuine and beautiful lesbian love which women sometimes share freely with each other. But no. Instead we hear from a perfectly typical sorority girl who went on to become a bad writer...
hm commented on Jul 24 05 at 8:42 pm
the venemous comments below, apparently from lesbian readers of Hooksexup, who make up a few percentage points of the Hooksexup readership according to the latest poll, reflect poorly on the lesbian community. i have no doubt that lesbians endure much undue hardship in this country, and i sympathize. however, speaking as though you have some kind of exclusive right to kissing between women than is violated when women who are not exclusively gay kiss one another or scissor fuck or whatever is every bit as closeminded and pig-headed as the attitudes of those who stigmatize lesbians. listen to yourselves for a moment. this is an essay by a woman who describes how powerful and moving it was for her to kiss other women a decade ago. you would rather deny her that pleasure and that life experience because you are so insecure about your identity that you want every homosexual experience accompanied by a contract stating that both individuals commit to a lifetime of homosexual behavior? part of the reason that this issue is necessary -- and thank you Hooksexup for publishing it -- is because small-minded homosexuals like you chose to villify and exclude from your community those who want to fool around with both genders. open your eyes, look outside the walls of your little walled city, you are taking on the characteristics of your own oppressors.
sam commented on Jul 25 05 at 8:10 am
here here sam! and what's with this assumption that its a TERRIBLE thing that heterosexual men are turned on by lesbian activities? i guess i can imagine that it gets annoying as a dedicated lesbian -- all the eye rolls and stupid jokes and what have you -- but at the end of day, the only thing worse than the annoyance of being desired is the insult of not being desired. arousal is a kind of compliment. men find women physically attractive and, on a primal level, in the heat of the moment, consider two better than one and three better than two. why aren't women universally turned on by gay male sex? i can tell you that as a predominently straight male, i have always been saddened by the results of my polls on this subject -- most women say they are not turned on by gay male sex. as a younger guy, i found this disappointing. everyone wants to be objectified on some level. sure, its great to be loved for your mind, for who you are and what you do, but there is a lazy appeal to being desired for your body alone ... you don't have to do anything or prove anything to kindle that form of desire. the word "objectify" is used as a pejorative, but sex is an activity between two bodies, two objects, and as a male anyway one wants to have the favor of objectification returned. some women may say they would prefer not to be lusted after, but i suspect in 50 years when their desirability in the marketplace recedes to a pale glow, they will have a different view of annoyance of being desired.
stj commented on Jul 25 05 at 8:48 am
Thanks for your thoughtful take on girl-on-girl college experimentation. I didn
elr commented on Jul 25 05 at 2:49 pm
I guess this doesn't happen much on these boards, but I want to say thank you, sam. I wrote those venomous words at a late hour in the night and actually I wasn't sure I believed them even as I was writing them. I think I was upset about something silly completely unrelated and felt like ranting anonymously (one of the many joys of the internet
hm commented on Jul 26 05 at 12:04 pm
I've had serious committed relationships with other women, and I've had serious committed relationships with men. What bothers me most about the LUG and BUG phenomenon, is not that "straight" girls feel a comfortable environment for experimentation, but that my relationship with a woman I love becomes public entertainment if we go anywhere together holding hands. Having been harrassed countless times when we declined to make out publicly, I'm almost tempted to pretend I'm straight. It's not the acceptance that bothers me, it's how aggressive it is.
CAT commented on Jan 26 07 at 7:32 pm
Totally in tune with your feelings and without guilt just about resumes how people should feel after *experimentation*, and not shy away from just saying: "Hey, we just had fun. Piss off!"
cd commented on Jun 30 07 at 4:42 am

Leave a Comment