Register Now!
LOG IN  |  SIGN UP
10
 REGULARS








Bigicon




  Send to a Friend
  Printer Friendly Format
  Leave Feedback
  Read Feedback
  Hooksexup RSS

Two of the biggest media brouhahas of the past few weeks inspired much hand-wringing over the sexualization of young girls.

The first was the April raid by the Texas state police on the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS), a radical polygamist sect splintered from the Mormon denomination.

promotion

The other big story involved Miley Cyrus, the "squeaky-clean" Disney icon, who got half-naked for Vanity Fair, prompting a titillation-tinged argument about that timeless bone of contention: how young is too young?


While no one defends forcing fifteen-year-old girls to marry fifty-year-old men, it seems we're in a state of cultural cognitive dissonance when it comes to Lolita issues. On the one hand, teenage-chastity clubs, whether they work or not, have proliferated in the past decade. On the other, the New York Times runs smirking articles about such clubs, implying that their members are brainwashed by Christian ideology. Seventeen year olds who screw fifteen year olds get labeled sex offenders, while MILFs are a teen-comedy staple and teacher-student porn isn't particularly frowned upon.


In the case of the polygamists, the source of the outrage is clear and well-founded: we feel that these young women been brainwashed and physically imprisoned. Yet polygamist groups have operated ever since the Mormon Church officially ended the practice in the 1890s so Utah could become a state, and there hadn't been a raid on polygamist compound since the 1950s. Perhaps America's zeal for freedom of religion — an angle to this story that the ACLU has argued should at least be part of the debate — allows us to look the other way.

The "Maiden Tribute" helped begin a tradition in British newspaper reporting that found its ultimate expression in the Page 3 Girl.



Why do we consider adolescents to be off-limits until a certain age, and then suddenly not only capable of participating in the sexual economy, but duty-bound to do so? And why does this age seem to be constantly moving to suit our needs?

The answer lies in the original concept for an "age of consent." In English and early American common law, when society was primarily agricultural and family members were labor, the unofficial age of consent was often between ten and twelve. It wasn't until the nineteenth-century invention of adolescence — that is, a time when children are sexually mature, but still unable to make adult decisions — that things began to change.

On July 6, 1885, W.T. Stead, editor of the London Pall Mall Gazette, published the first in a series of scandalous articles, the "Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon." An epic piece of writing that shocked England, the "Maiden Tribute" told, in explicit detail, how innocent (and therefore syphilis-free) young virgins were being kidnapped and enslaved by brothels to service debauched men willing to pay for the privilege. Truly a landmark in journalistic history, the "Maiden Tribute" produced the same shuddering horror sought by today's daytime TV talk shows, and helped begin a tradition in British newspaper reporting that found its ultimate expression in the Page 3 Girl.





     

  





Comments ( 10 )

Interesting article. The sexualization of young people bothers me not because I'm uptight, but because young people often cannot process sexual images and attitudes. Becoming sexualized too young warps the mind, I believe, ruins the fun and lightness of youth. I don't think people need to wait until marriage, or that it's wrong for teenagers to have sex; it's just the mass media's sexualization of what are essentially just kids that bothers me. Concepts of innocence and virginity are really damaging, too, though; obsessing over these two things can make people feel like they're used goods once they've had sex, like they've lost something and therefore are not as good. And the existence of and obsession over the hymen has ruined lives, it's horrible. I've see this in my own country, in the community I grew up in...sorry, going off topic!!
zin commented on May 10 08 at 7:14 pm
This is some of the best writing I have seen on Hooksexup in some time. A compelling read.
N commented on May 10 08 at 8:43 pm
I credit Will Doig's editing... the man makes everything he touches shine...
KenM commented on May 11 08 at 6:52 am
Cyrus was not "half naked" and she was not on the cover.
MC commented on May 12 08 at 12:39 am
I believe it was a Texas State Police raid and not a FBI raid.
mll commented on May 11 08 at 1:33 pm
Seriously? Is this article questioning the age of consent? Specifically young females ability to judge for themselves when sex is appropriate? Did you really suggest that laws are in place merely to protect white middle class traditions? wtf is this essay. The editing is crap, the thought process is too broad, never a strong opinion or thesis statement, and i think i might be sickened by the notion that young girls, "lolitas", have any real rational judgment in this area-- but i cant tell if that was actually suggested.
em commented on May 13 08 at 8:02 pm
Is anything more laughable than Americans acting schzoid about sexual behavior? Especially in regards to how other people get off.
RG commented on May 14 08 at 5:55 pm
oh please, quoting ONE case to argue a point is just lazy reasoning, The young man sentenced to jail was guilty of rape. The girl who had sex with was drunk and unable to give consent. Here's an idea: Don't have sex with people unless they are sober enough to know what they're doing! The fact that he was also prosecuted as a child molestor for having consensual sex with a 15 year old is, of course, ridiculous. Even the jury thought so. There is a huge difference though in teens having sex with other teens and a grown man having sex with a teen. And girls are not "sexually mature" at the age of 10 or 11 (or even a bit older). Sexual maturity is not solely contingant upon being able to reproduce. And really, what we're talking about is girls when we talk about the age of consent because, in general, it is certain men who just can't stand the idea that there are laws to keep them from having sex with young girls and teenagers. These men are pathetic and need to grow up. Being thankful that these laws exist has nothing to do with being sexual uptight. What's sad is that we even need these laws to protect children and teenagers. Adults should only play with other adults.
SAD commented on May 16 08 at 2:54 pm
i don't know about boys, but girls are capable of sex at an earlier age. so the neocons not only raise the "age of consent", they now want to apply it to boys. get real, folks.
dwp commented on May 16 08 at 8:07 pm
not only is this an incredibly lazy argument, it is also factually incorrect. the age of consent throughout the eighteenth century was 21--any union of people younger than this age required parental consent. It was not until the mid-victorian age that age of consent for girls was lowered to an average of 14 years old. these stats are for England; other places, other mores. not to pay attention to regional or periodic differences detracts from any narrative point the author is making.
gof commented on May 17 08 at 7:31 pm

Leave a Comment