Register Now!

Five Things AMC Should Do To Win Back Its Reputation

The network that brought us Mad Men and Breaking Bad needs another hit.


By Rick Paulas

With the explosive ending of Breaking Bad in our collective rearview, and Mad Men not starting up until next March, there's a big lull in quality original programming over at AMC. The network that once had visions of competing with HBO in dominating water-cooler conversations is now doing so — but for all the wrong reasons. After the one-two punch of Mad and Bad, they're still looking for a third hit. Rubicon was pulled after a season despite critical acclaim; The Walking Dead broke all sorts of ratings records, but that seems more due to the "zombies are on TV" bump than the show's actual quality; and the less said about The Killing, the better. They'll try to right the ship this November with a Western, Hell on Wheels, but that doesn't seem like a game-changer. Looming in the distance is an even bigger issue: both Breaking Bad and Mad Men have their series finales in sight, the former a mere sixteen episodes away while the latter has three seasons to go before Don Draper presumably dies of lung cancer/liver explosion/every venereal disease known to mankind. So this is the time for the network to start thinking about their future. Here are five things they should do:

 

1. Quit with the remakes and adaptations.

Both Breaking Bad and Mad Men felt like fresh, innovative properties. No one had done a period piece about ad executives in the '60s before. No one had written a show about a high-school teacher who cooks meth. But then AMC started getting cold feet with original properties, settling for remakes (The Prisoner), comic-book adaptations (The Walking Dead), and Americanized versions of Danish TV shows (The Killing). In each case, AMC let the door open for critics and viewers to compare them to the original, and in all cases the new versions fell short. Just start with something fresh.

 

2. Find the right showrunners.

Whatever method the execs have been using to find showrunners hasn't been working. Rubicon creator and showrunner Jason Horwitch left the show before the pilot aired. No one's entirely sure what's been going on with Frank Darabont in The Walking Dead's writers room; first he fired his staff, then he said he'd be using freelancers for the second season, then he stepped down (or got fired, depending on who's telling the story). And in post-finale interviews, The Killing's Veena Sud somehow made people hate the show even more. Yes, you're dealing with alpha-type personalities when it comes to showrunners — and no doubt AMC's had enough headaches during contract negotiations with Matthew Weiner and Vince Gilligan — but a streak like this means someone at the top isn't doing the right amount of leg-work.


3. To paraphrase another network's tagline, characters are not just welcome, but necessary.

While AMC's motto is "Story Matters Here," their iconic characters were the reason they were once considered in the Best TV Networks discussion. You can feel comfortable going out on Halloween as Don Draper or Walter White without having to explain it. But after that? There's nobody. The problem with every show since was a focus more on the plot than the characters dealing with it. You can pretty much take anyone from The Killing and throw them in the world of The Walking Dead without losing a beat; instead of finding a killer, they'd be killing zombies. When searching for properties, AMC needs to focus less on plot dynamics and more on character arcs. (Also, apparently it doesn't hurt to get alliterative with the main character's name.)


4. Leave reality shows to lesser networks.

AMC is set to launch four reality shows towards the end of the year. One follows the behind-the-scenes machinations of Homeland Security, another focuses on a family-owned private security company, another tries to capitalize on Mad Men by following around actual ad executives, and a fourth is set inside Kevin Smith's Jersey-based comic-book shop. These are all mistakes. AMC's brand, the thing that made them more than just a clearinghouse for horror movies during October's "Monsterfest" and black-and-white westerns during the rest of the year, is quality scripted programming. That's what set them apart in the first place. If their toe-dip into reality programming turns into a full leg submersion, they'll soon just be lost in the annoying alphabet soup of the TLCs, A&Es and MTVs.


5. Invest in comedy.

FX has become a go-to network for great original programming over the past few years, pretty much based on the greatness of their half-hour comedies alone. It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia led the way with its low-budget crude sensibilities, followed by the animated vulgarities of Archer, and then the most critically-acclaimed show currently in existence, Louie. If budgetary issues are the reason AMC's dipping into the reality pond, they should be producing low-budget comedies instead. And actually, they actually just announced a comedy, but it doesn't look too promising. Dig a little deeper, guys — it's never been easier to find high-quality, established comedic voices. You don't need to comb the country — you just need to look at their YouTube channels. Find a great comedian or sketch group, give them a Louie-style deal (a smallish budget and nearly unlimited creative control), and see what comes of it. At the least, it'll make AMC interesting again. At the most, it'll make them relevant.

Commentarium (13 Comments)

Oct 13 11 - 2:59am
nope

-The Walking Dead has a good chance of being better this season. The comic started off very weak and then got more involved in the themes of trying to rebuild civilization and recapture humanity in A World Gone Mad, although yes, the characters are always weak. It has been a problematic show,but writing it off after 6 episodes seems premature.
-AMC is wiping the floor with HBO. Game of Thrones is their only gem, after that the drop-off to Boardwalk Empire is steep. Oh, and you don't have to pay a premium for AMC.
-While it's true that FX has become a strange but welcome home to comedies that are too odd for network TV but not quite adult swim odd (ignoring adult swim alumni Adam Reed), AMC cannot simply imitate FX's success. What it can do is learn from it--FX saw its successes and capitalized on them. AMC should do the same, instead of branching out into new and unwelcome territory. It has done well with smartly written, highly serialized dramas. Also, the idea that a comedy could be It's Always Sunny-cheap didn't exist before It's Always Sunny. I simply don't buy that you can't have a good drama that's not crazy expensive. AMC doesn't seem to understand that you can have substance without style, which would be a good budgetary lesson for them.
-C.K. is one of the most interesting, thoughtful, funny and unique voices in the world today. You can't just throw money and airtime at anyone and come out with Louie.

Oct 13 11 - 4:38am
anonymous

I agree with everything you said except that about Boardwalk. I love that show, the premise, and Steve Buscemi.

Oct 13 11 - 8:46am
noctornalinaz

...and what's the deal with their late night BACK2BACK2BACK...'3 stooges' episodes? ugh.

Oct 13 11 - 1:04pm
Kim

I don't get the Walking Dead hate. Not that this article was hateful at all, but in general I don't hear too many good reports about it. I don't think its at the level of Mad Men and Breaking Bad (or Justified as long FX was already brought up) but I enjoyed the first season and remember being moved by some of the performances and many of the visuals. Although, yeah the characters themselves are basically stock.

Oct 19 11 - 9:31pm
JCB

I don't get the Walking Dead hate either. It's consistently entertaining and suspenseful, and there are some great actors on there among the standard TV riffraff (Michael Rooker, Norman Reedus etc). While the writing is uneven at times, it's never been weak enough to justify all the critical vitriol. I think the fact that it's been an over-advertised ratings juggernaut, along with the behind-the-scenes drama, has brought on a lot of knee-jerk hate from the critics that the viewing audience apparently doesn't share. But what do we know, we're just tasteless philistines who don't get paid to give our opinions on things.

Oct 19 11 - 9:36pm
JCB

And for the record, I always hated Mad Men and its winking, self-conscious anachronism. I wouldn't be watching AMC at all if it weren't for the Walking Dead. So nyah.

Oct 13 11 - 6:12pm
luke

Ok walking dead is not breaking bad or mad men but you have to give them credit for making a series out of what could have just been a studio movie. Sure no big names except darabont but that us what sets them apart from hbo. They make stars out of whoever they get and run with it. Look at how much work cranston gets now. And I think walking dead and the killing both deserve a chance cause they are wonderful and keep you tuned in every week. And look at fx they have great shows that I am a.die hard fan of but some of the stories are so far fetched and every episode ends and your not left on the edge of your seat like you are with amc shows. I guess what I am getting at is whoever wrote this article is a terrible critic. And how can you not enjoy boardwalk empire? I'm not a fan of game of thrones but I guarantee that the loosely based true story of nucky is more interesting than the fantasy world of thrones.

Oct 13 11 - 7:56pm
Mac

You are crazy. The Walking Dead is a fantastic show. It fits your narrative of "Quit with the remakes and adaptations", but only because its an adaptation. Not for lack of quality. Its one of the better shows on TV. Is it the best? No, but its fun, engaging, well written, and well acted. In the end you want more. Now, season 2 could suck or it could be even better. Who knows.

Oct 13 11 - 11:03pm
el profe

AMC lost me with "The Killing." I'll wait for DVDs if/when "Mad Men" ever returns, but I'll never watch AMC again.

Oct 14 11 - 3:02am
Rick

The author vastly underestimates the quality of Walking Dead. I don't see how it could have been better. Yes, MM and BB are at another level, but come on, WD can be considered one leg of AMC's Murderers' Row.

BTW, critics loved it too. 82 is very high:
https://www.metacritic.com/tv/the-walking-dead

Oct 19 11 - 8:31pm
sarel101

How about showing movies that actually qualify as classic?

Jan 17 12 - 8:42pm
actually

The Walking Dead is terrible this season and under estimates it's audience but then the show is not for every one because of it's pretentious attitude when the show is not that good. They will tell you it is and very deep and complicated but it's not. After Breaking Bad it will take a lot for me to look at this channel again and will not be watching the Walking Train Wreck anymore. What a train wreck of character development story arcs and pretentious drama written scenes with pretentious members of it trying to tell us that this show deals with the human element. There are better soap operas out there.

Jan 31 12 - 7:25pm
Tresix

To be honest, AMC lost me more when they started showing commercials. In its original form, it was like TCM. They could be good competition for TCM if they went back to their original format and kept their TV shows (and also dump the "Rifleman" and "CSI: Miami" reruns).

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: