Register Now!

The 10 Best Things About the New Star Trek

Posted by Brian Fairbanks

 

Haven't seen the new Star Trek yet? You are not alone... in the universe! Ha... is joke.

Seriously, this might end up being the first film in ages to actually draw in significant repeat business-- Trekkies are over the moon, film buffs are racing at warp speed to get home and blog, and we've run out of bad puns already. In other words, don't be left out this weekend...

10. This could be the Star Trek film that breaks the Oscar curse. The series is 0 for 10, mainly in sound and effects categories, and has never been nominated in a category bigger than cinematography. But we would not be surprised, given the quality of movies released this year, that Star Trek pics up nods in screenplay, effects, and even acting categories. You heard it here first.

9. Leonard Nimoy's cameo gives the movie great dramatic weight-- unlike 99.9% of all prequel cameos. Most of the time, when you bring back the star of a film's previous series, it results in mockery and cinematic travesty. For example, Sean Connery's return as James Bond nearly ruined the series, even more so than the casting of Timothy Dalton. Thankfully, this Star Trek is more, say, Diamonds Are Forever than Never Say Never Again.

8. It finally launched little known film director J.J. Abrams's career. Abrams, you probably didn't know, has spent years slumming it as the #1 producer of network television.

7. If this guy hates it, it must be good. The self-described Trekkie fails to see what's great about the movie-- it's Star Trek without all the hokey sci-fi goofing around that turned off so many casual viewers. 

6. It makes us want to go watch the first four movies again. (Although, of course, nothing can make us want to watch any of the others.) That's the big difference with this and the Star Wars prequels-- it actually belongs in the series canon.

5. Because J.J. chose quality over a gimmick. Bill Shatner has made no bones (no pun intended) about his disdain for the filmmakers. We see his point-- Nimoy gets a huge supporting role, while Shatner doesn't even merit a walk-on. But Abrams & co. were right to leave that rumored cameo unfilmed-- the scene that would kind-of work, initially slated to follow the climax, could easily have stalled the movie's dramatic momentum and might have sent people out of the theater shaking their heads at the inappropriate side-tracking. Abrams made the very wise decision to not risk the movie's tension-- and it was clearly the right decision.

4. Because it will launch the career of a great young actor, Chris Pine. When we first saw trailers for the film, we kept saying, "Man, the new Kirk looks like a poor man's Ryan Reynolds." And saying someone is anything like Ryan Reynolds is a huge insult where we come from. That "annoying-looking pretty boy model," Chris Pine, turns in he year's best breakthrough performance-- are you listening, MTV?

3. All the ladies agree: Zachary Quinto is the thinking woman's sex symbol for the 21st Century. Spock, as Quinto plays him, is transformed into a studly romantic brainiac badass. Who could've predicted that?

2. This weekend, it will likely become the highest-grossing Tyler Perry movie of all time. Yes-- he's in two scenes and since no one knew he was in the film when it first opened, there were whispers all around: "Hot damn-- is that Madea?"

1. It's just that damn entertaining. We watched the film with a mild fan and two people who had very little interest in the movie-- and all enjoyed it tremendously. They agreed with this reviewer that Star Trek jump-starts a series that had been "mined to exhaustion." Best of all, this weekend, it goes up against Angels and Demons, the sequel to The Da Vinci Code, giving you yet another reason to help keep this atop the box office...

 

Related:

The Hot Line: Star Trek

The Hottest Unknown Women Of Star Trek

"I Broke My Dick And It Made Shatner A Star"

While You Were Sleeping: Mel Gibson Is In Trouble Now


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT

Comments

Fad23 said:

I kind of agree with the reviewer from the Salt Lake Tribune. It's a good popcorn flick, but I found it lacking.

May 13, 2009 3:29 PM

fabul1st said:

I am an equally devout Trekkie as the reviewer, for example, I have been interviewed in full Borg makeup (complete with blinking lights on my clothes) for two company training videos that were each shown to a couple of thousand colleagues all over the world. Mr. Horiuchi does not speak for all trekkies.  Many of us, myself included, were hoping for a refresh to the franchise after the last two disastrously bad ST:TNG movies after First Contact, and JJ Abrams has delivered for us.  In addition, this movie was just the foundation for a new series and we need to wait for the next movie, which will be the first full-fledged story in the new time line. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and give this story line room to grow.

May 13, 2009 6:50 PM

fabul1st said:

Regarding point #6 -- I would suggest skipping the first ST movie and instead adding in the first 100% New Generation movie, First Contact.  It was both an excellent movie in terms of story and execution, and it fit perfectly within the Star Trek canon.  

May 13, 2009 6:58 PM

Monique said:

Yay! more lists!

May 13, 2009 7:33 PM

Brian Fairbanks said:

I'll check that out, fabul1st, thanks... and you're right, I remember falling asleep during the epic Star Trek: The Motion Picture...

May 13, 2009 8:52 PM

allfathersdotter said:

HAH - I love #3! It's so funny, the main thought in my head at the end of viewing the film was that Spoc and Ahora needed to make out a whole lot more!  

May 14, 2009 11:28 PM

About Brian Fairbanks

Brian Fairbanks, the Senior National Political Correspondent for Hooksexup, is a filmmaker living in Brooklyn or New Orleans, depending on the season. He is a heavily-armed advocate of gun control.

in