This Week in Sex: Blame the Hippies
The Catholic Church takes on flower power, plus National Masturbation Month and more on Dominique Strauss Kahn.
- ‹ prev
- next ›
Sexual abuse in clergy blamed on hippies
A five-year study, spearheaded by America's Catholic Bishops, looking into the cause of the clergy’s sexual-abuse crisis has concluded that it was neither the fault of the all-male celibate priesthood or latent homosexuality. Instead, they argue, the abuse occurred because of poorly prepared, overstressed priests working during the social and sexual turmoil of the 1960s. That’s right, the sexual revolution.
Compare that with another report that blames the '60s for the increasing incidence of STDs among senior citizens. "The flower children who were in their twenties back in the 1960s are now in their seventies," the article reads. "They're the make-love-not-war generation, and old habits die hard." It’s a dark day for hippies, when they’re blamed for everything from creepy priests to your grandmothers genital warts.
It's hard to tell if it’s funny or sad that the sexual revolution and the ‘60s are still cast as bogeyman to a lot of people, especially since we’re closing in on the fiftieth anniversary of the Summer of Love. Also, while some people in the sixties embraced "free love," — it was also the birth of modern conservatism, and the decade of Richard Nixon's "Silent Majority."
More importantly, a fantasy about a past where Jimi Hendrix is forever wailing on "All Along the Watchtower" and driving us to make bad choices, keeps the focus away from the actual problems. If old people are getting STDs, we should educate them. And, well, I don’t know what to do about the priests, but blaming flower power isn’t going to help.
Commentarium (18 Comments)
I would say that this is a new low for the Catholic church, but I guess it's not really even close.
Why do they still have ANY authority or respect?
This is really weak... They must've spent all their money on litigation, because apparently they have no resources left for P.R.
@KS: This is the same old low, a throwback to the days of exterminating non-christians (i.e. all natives/africans/polenesians that balked at conversion). The Church has been pulling this calibre of B.S. for hundreds of years, it's just that newsn traveled much more slowly in the past.
@ Joe: They don't...
I'd definitely agree that teenage guys, for the most part, are gunna masturbate regardless. But girls are so deeply shamed and mystified about their genitals, so i think a masturbation movement of sorts seems like it can't possibly hurt.
that's true... a lot of girls have very little idea of what goes on inside them.the movie teeth was about exactly this,although it was a satire, it hit the hail on the head.Des Bishop has a lot to say on female masturbation and although it caused an awkward evenings viewing for my parents and I, he made a good point.people have to get rid of the stigma that is female masturbation
Hooray for Gov. Walker. Look, if you believe in a God, then homosexuality is wrong. If you don't believe in a God, then homosexuality is proof of natural selection; you can't breed and therefore are an abherration.
Heterosexuals who don't want to have a child are also aberrations against nature. There should be laws against such abominations. They're not normal people, therefore they don't deserve the rights of regular people. Really they all just belong in prison. Just like priests. Who also don't have children.
"if you believe in a God, then homosexuality is wrong" .... I don't know what God you're referring to, but it isn't mine. Please don't presume to think you know everything about all religions, or really anything about theology at all. Because you obviously don't.
Also, one could argue that having an autoimmune disease such as type 1 diabetes or M.S. is also a form of "natural selection". You seem to also forget the thousands of (hetero) people who suffer with fertility issues every year. Aberrations, by your count, yes? Does this mean we should treat them like second-class citizens, or anything less than any other human being? If you can possibly answer yes, you clearly have a very twisted take on humanity, natural rights and compassion.
Homosexuality may have a very positive effect on natural selection. Paternity can be in doubt, but maternity is always established, so children with a childless, homosexual maternal uncle or aunt can benefit from having additional resources. I.e., a gay man or woman may not pass on genes directly, but can through a hetero sibling, especially a sister.
Your understanding of natural selection is obviously as flawed as your understanding of theology. "... homosexuality is proof of natural selection; you can't breed and therefore are an abherration." if anything the opposite is true, if being gay was something that could be 'weeded' from a population purely by reproducing it would have already happened.
nuh-uh watches gay porn, has bad thoughts in the shower and let me rawdog him in a mens room at he airport. He's not gay though.
Yeah, that must be it, PMO. Everybody who is straight is really a closeted gay, right? That's the kind of incoherent response I would expect from somebody whose first time was with their father. Good luck with the therapy.
So maybe the hippies were indeed responsible for all these things. How does blaming them now help to solve these problems?
You wait until now to remind us it's Masturbation Month? I am going to wear myself out catching up!
Your comment about doing some prostitution if you thought you'd get any customers makes me wonder if there are totally unsuccessful prostitutes. Like: "Hey man, want to party?" John: "Uh, noooooo...." (Repeat throughout the night.)
jill
https://inbedwithmarriedwomen.blogspot.com
Well, we didn't manage to bring down any governments or stop war; it's nice to think we could at least crush the Catholic church. All that acid and all those boring be-ins weren't in vain after all.
I wonder if AMERICAN APPAREL was present back in those days...would hippies boycott it for lack of authenticity?
Now you say something