Register Now!

It looks like the former Senator from Pennsylvania, Rick Santorum, is working on getting another alternative definition to his last name. In an interview on Right Wing Watch, Santorum discusses the anti-choice movement's desire to add the "personhood" of zygotes and fetuses to the United States Constitution. Barack Obama's platform on abortion issues has been pro-choice throughout his presidency. He naturally answered "no" when asked whether a zygote ought to be considered a human being, afforded the same rights and privileges as actual human beings, from the moment of conception. Rick says:

The question is — and this is what Barack Obama didn't want to answer — is that human life a person under the Constitution? And Barack Obama says no. Well if that person — human life is not a person, then — I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say, 'we're going to decide who are people and who are not people.

Santorum insultingly draws a parallel between Obama's blackness and the plight of zygotes. I will tell you, Rick Santorum, the reason that these two examples are not equatable — and this is only the most glaring and obvious reason — is that black people can definitely survive outside of their mother's uteri. And to address the slavery connection you so tastelessly implied, I think that if you enslaved a black person, or any adult person of any race, alongside a zygote, the actual human being would be substantially worse off, since they would have the capacity to experience and understand their enslavement.

Many individuals oppose abortion for everyone, and I respectfully disagree with them, but I think the anti-choice argument ought to rely on the idea that a zygote is a potential human being, not on incendiary racial rhetoric.

Commentarium (10 Comments)

Jan 20 11 - 3:43pm
GG

What a fucking pig this guy. What the hell is his job nowadays anyway?

Jan 20 11 - 4:30pm
robert paulsen

i often wonder how well politicians performed in classes such as economics and the hard sciences in high school and college when they say things like this. reliance on the Constitution as written seems remarkably silly, but then, most politicians have never read the whole thing, either.

Jan 20 11 - 4:31pm
profrobert

Suppose the zygote is the product of man-on-dog sex? What then, you Frothy Mixture, what then?

Jan 20 11 - 6:07pm
meh

The constitution is pretty clear that you have to be born to be a citizen of the US and being conceived in the US is not enough. The talk of amending the constitution is mostly grandstanding anyway since the chances of getting the legislature of 3/4 of the states to ratify any sort of change are pretty close to zero.

Jan 20 11 - 6:12pm
steveowinlow

I think he is trying to make a reference to Dread Scott.

Jan 20 11 - 7:40pm
GG

It's Dred Scott, and he's not trying very hard. I just love it when assholes like him drop whatever comes through their mind, expecting others to fill in the blanks. This is an offensive comparison any way you look at it. Dred Scott was very much born, and very much enslaved. Only a douchebag Republican would even see how that compares to the rights of zygotes.

Jan 21 11 - 9:14am
Loose Dog

This might be a bit more understandable if Mr Santorum were actually running against Mr Obama for some office (either one would have trouble being elected dogcatcher). But he isn't.

Jan 21 11 - 12:03pm
GarrettCarey

The funny thing about it is that he thinks he's so clever. Like "a ha, black people! I got you there. So, you're all Republicans now, right?"

Mar 22 11 - 10:30pm
Eric

What can we expect from someone named after the nastiness of anal sex without enough fiber in the diet?

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: