A Brief Exploration Of Wikipedia's Flaws, With A Special Appearance By Boobs
By James Brady RyanDecember 14th, 2009, 12:52 pmComments (3)
Ah, Wikipedia. Whatever did the world do without you? The intellectual vandalism must have taken so much more work! Anyway, I was perusing the entry for "Victorian Fashion" (which - ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE ME), like one does on a Monday, when I came to the section on "Victorian prudery." Oh hi there, irony. Take a seat. Let me get you something to drink. Here's the page:
Sorry, what was that at the end there?
Oh right, yeah, totally. The real problem here is that I'm just not getting any information about the upper boobs, you know? Does he like to lick them, too? Or are they gross? But I guess that's the danger of using Wikipedia; the article quality can be so spotty.
Commentarium (3 Comments)
lol, that's hilarious. I read one once on Mel Gibson (don't ask...) and it mentioned his early gay porn career...
What do you mean, flaws? This is why I read Wikipedia.
Wow this warranted a page on this site? Congrats, you've just done what 10,000 teenagers did that day, and you didn't have the creativity to go beyond scatological terms, which 9,999 of them used. It also just takes one click to revert vandalism, so you're not exactly blowing up Parliament here.