Scanner

You're right that the Gender Guesser software isn't definitive regarding Ann Coulter, but your attempt to argue its invalidity suffers the same common mistake: it's a statistical predictor, not an individual one.  It cannot predict an individual any more than a smoker's chances of getting lung cancer predict a *specific* smoker getting lung cancer.  Rather, the prediction is "in a room with 100 people that are all writing in this style, the majority of them will be male".  Attempting to prove this algorithm false by example is just as erroneous as saying Ann Coulter is definitively a man because the algorithm says so.

That being said, Ann Coulter's manhood is worth a laugh or two. ;-)

For more information, read the paper "Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts" by Argamon (Dept of Comp Sci, Illinois Institute of Technology), Koppel (Dept of Math and Comp Sci, Bar-Ilan University), Fine (Dept of English, Bar-Ilan University), and Shimoni (Dept of Math and Comp Sci, Bar-Ilan University).

I got 85% male on my last philosophy paper.  Last time I checked my pants, there's 0% penis in there.

I don't care if the software is not accurate. I think she really does look very mannish. The adams apple and that loooo---->ng cow face.

Just picture that in the morning.