Register Now!

Media

  • scannerscanner
  • scannerscreengrab
  • modern materialistthe modern
    materialist
  • video61 frames
    per second
  • videothe remote
    island

Photo

  • the daily siegedaily siege
  • autumn blogautumn
  • brandonlandbrandonland
  • chasechase
  • rose & oliverose & olive

Blog-
a-log

  • kid_playkid_play
  • supercsuper_c
  • charlotte_webcharlotte_web
  • sj1000sj1000
  • funkybrownchickfunkybrown
    chick
  • zeitgeistyzeitgeisty
The Hooksexup Insider
A daily pick of what's new and hot at Hooksexup.
Scanner
Your daily cup of WTF?
Hooksexup@SXSW 2006.
Blogging the Roman Orgy of Indie-music Festivals.
Coming Soon!
Coming Soon!
Coming Soon!
The Daily Siege
An intimate and provocative look at Siege's life, work and loves.
Kate & Camilla
two best friends pursue business and pleasure in NYC.
Naughty James
The lustful, frantic diary of a young London photographer.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: kid_play
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Super_C
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: ILoveYourMom
A bundle of sass who's trying to stop the same mistakes.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: The_Sentimental
Our newest Blog-a-logger.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Marking_Up
Gay man in the Big Apple, full of apt metaphors and dry wit.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: SJ1000
Naughty and philosophical dispatches from the life of a writer-comedian who loves bathtubs and hates wearing underpants.
The Hooksexup Video Blog
Deep, deep inside the world of online video.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: charlotte_web
A Demi in search of her Ashton.
The Prowl, with Ryan Pfluger
Hooksexup @ Cannes Film Festival
May 16 - May 25
ScreenGrab
The Hooksexup Film Blog
Autumn
A fashionable L.A. photo editor exploring all manner of hyper-sexual girls down south.
The Modern Materialist
Almost everything you want.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: that_darn_cat
A sassy Canadian who will school you at Tetris.
Rose & Olive
Houston neighbors pull back the curtains and expose each other's lives.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: funkybrownchick
The name says it all.
merkley???
A former Mormon goes wild, and shoots nudes, in San Francisco.
chase
The creator of Supercult.com poses his pretty posse.
The Remote Island
Hooksexup's TV blog.
Brandonland
A California boy capturing beach parties, sunsets and plenty of skin.
61 Frames Per Second
Smarter gaming.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Charlotte_Web
A Demi in search of her Ashton.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Zeitgeisty
A Manhattan pip in search of his pipette.

Scanner

Should Christian Science Monitor Be Fed To The Lions?

Posted by Brian Fairbanks

 

Forgive the controversy-baiting title: it really is necessary to draw your attention to the most offensive article written this year in the English language.

The article, written under the name Shireen K. Burki for the always suspect Christian Science Monitor (hell, that's almost a triple negative), is so ghastly, so offensive, wrong, and off-base in its attacks on Barack Obama, that not only will Hillary supporters be outraged, McCain himself might end up weighing in on it... if he can locate his missing moral compass, that is...

Have you eaten today? Then don't read this excerpt:

Osama bin Laden must be chuckling in his safe house. After all, the 2008 campaign could very well give Al Qaeda the ultimate propaganda tool: President Barack Hussein Obama, Muslim apostate.

The fact that Senator Obama – the son of a Muslim father – insists he was never a Muslim before becoming Christian is irrelevant to bin Laden. In bin Laden's eyes, Obama is a murtad fitri, the worst type of apostate, because he was blessed by Allah to be born into the true faith of Islam.

We tried to stop reading-- but we were pretty sure this was weak satire that would get better over time. After all, doesn't someone have to actually believe in the religion they are born into to become an apostate? It's not converting, it's joining when one decides one would live to become a Christian, as his mother was. But that's obviously less objectionable than the rest of this complete nonsense:

According to Islamic jurisprudence, children of a Muslim father – even an apparently nonpracticing one, such as Obama's father, and irrespective of the mother's faith – are automatically Muslims. Most Muslims around the world agree: A child of a Muslim father is a Muslim. Period.

And I bet if you ask Christians around the world if, because Obama's mother was a Christian, he is automatically a Christian, they would agree: a child of a Christian mother is a Christian. Period.

People: how clear do we have to make this? Calling Obama a Muslim is a fear tactic, not the least because it's untrue but because its only purpose is to connect him to Bin Laden, which is disgusting, wrong, immoral, untrue, and pathetic. We stopped reading after the above paragraph because we don't need to hear anything further-- these people will contradict themselves and prove to be awful hypocrites and no one will call them out on it. "Obama's pastor is un-American!" and "Obama is a Muslim in disguise!" are statements that prove, if nothing else, at least one is automatically untrue-- after all, as the Christian Science Monitor proves, you can't have two religions... or change your mind about one.

 Shireen K. Burki [who writes only to help incite religious warfare -Ed.] is an adjunct professor of political science at the University of Mary Washington, in Fredericksburg, Va. The daughter of a Muslim father and a Christian mother, she spent her childhood in Islamabad, Pakistan, where she studied Islam at school. [Christian Science Monitor]

You can tell her what you think of her at . 


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT

Comments

profrobert said:

And on top of everything else, her conclusion is wrong.  Having a person of color with a Muslim father as President of the United States would be a huge public relations win in Africa, the Middle East and other non-extremist Muslim countries.  Al Qaeda will find a way to twist whatever the election result is to support its own propaganda, but the people we're trying to reach are moderate and rational, and a President Obama would be a wonderful spokesman to the world for the United States.

May 20, 2008 12:06 PM

Kabistan said:

Will I definitely agree that the article is a nasty piece of fear-mongering, I think it is important to note that her principle point does not seem to be some spurious claim that Obama is a muslim.  Rather that Obama's having been 'born' muslim and then converting will be seen by muslim extremists as a symbol of western cultural imperialism/the clash of civilizations.

May 20, 2008 12:53 PM

Cris said:

Um, I think you're missing the point.  Her point is that according to Islamic jurisprudence, Barack Obama is considered a Muslim, regardless of what he considers himself.  And, although I am not an expert on this, I believe that that is correct.  In Muslim societies, this is an important legal question, because your official religion governs things like marriage, divorce, inheritence, and sometimes, taxation.  So regardless of what you believe (and Mr. Obama has been very clear about this), you have an assigned identity.

May 20, 2008 3:00 PM

Daniel J Dwyer said:

The Christian Science Monitor actually tends to be a very quality publication. I'm not sure what is supposed to be objectionable about this piece. It's very accurate. I have some Muslim students who are very torn over Obama. They support his ideals, but their religion views him as guilty of the most egregious of sins. These are very moderate Muslims. Irtidad is a crime usually punished by death in most of the Muslim world, moderate or not. It is also a sin to prevent the killing of an apostate, which could be a logistical issue for a president.

In any case, a number of papers have published more or less this same story in the past few months. Here's the New York Times version:

www.nytimes.com/.../12luttwak.html

May 20, 2008 4:15 PM

nederick said:

Yeah, she didn't "call Obama a Muslim," she explained why Muslims might.  Are you saying this fact should never see the light of day?  How is the fact that Muslims might consider Obama a Muslim a smear?  You also mention that you stopped reading after a certain paragraph and then inserted your own additional material about "these people," detailing hysterical things "they" say, and then indicting them for those imaginary statements.    

If you are going to dissect an article, you should probably stick to what it actually says.  And that would require reading the whole piece, as objectionable as that may be to you.

May 20, 2008 6:21 PM

Maxwell Hammer said:

I don't think any Christian would consider someone a Christian just because one of their parents was.

I know some Jews consider that to be the case.

To be a southern Baptist you have to have been saved (which is just sort of a personal revelation thing which is hard to explain) and baptized, which means dunking.

While there is no hard and fast rule about it, you would never see someone baptized before, oh, 4 years old. Usually it's more like 12. You have to volunteer for it, it's not done automatically.

You aren't actually a member of the church until that happens.

May 20, 2008 10:33 PM

Ben JB said:

This is not a new argument that Burki is presenting; it's come up before (Daniel Pipes offered the same interpretation), and only recently an op-ed in <i>The New York Times</i> made the same case--and was, if you missed it, handily refuted at the Huffington Post ( www.huffingtonpost.com/.../obama-islam-smear-changes_b_101337.html ).

What I really love about this whole "is he or isn't he?" issue is that the subtext is that Islamic fundamentalists hate Obama, but apparently are okay with McCain's plan to stay in Iraq spreading sunshine and lollipops.

May 21, 2008 12:44 AM

SMP said:

Brian, you just want to "kill the messenger."  As someone very sympathetic to Obama, I'm horrified that he may face this ridiculous charge of apostasy under traditional Muslim belief, but we can't just stick our heads in the sand and wish it wasn't so.  And since when is The Christian Science Monitor "always suspect?"  I couldn't agree less with Christian Science, but if you know anything at all about journalism, you should know it's a reliable, well-respected newspaper.

May 21, 2008 9:21 AM

blondage said:

Will someone at Hooksexup please pull the plug on this guy? He is really compromising the integrity of this site.  

May 21, 2008 7:12 PM

Brian Fairbanks said:

www.nytimes.com/.../01pubed.html

June 2, 2008 1:26 PM

About Brian Fairbanks

Brian Fairbanks, the Senior National Political Correspondent for Hooksexup, is a filmmaker living in the wilds of Brooklyn. He previously wrote for the Hartford Courant and Gawker/The Consumerist. He will be first against the wall, come the revolution.

in

Archives

about the blogger

Emily Farris writes about culture and food for numerous publications and websites you've probably never heard of, including her own blog eefers. Her first cookbook will be published in fall 2008. Emily lives in Greenpoint, Brooklyn with her cat, but just one . . . so far.

Brian Fairbanks is a filmmaker living in the wilds of Brooklyn. He previously wrote for the Hartford Courant and Gawker. He won the Williamsburg Spelling Bee once. He loves cats, women with guns, and burning books.

Nicole Pasulka is a Brooklyn writer and editor who's always on the lookout for the dirty. Her other virtual home is at The Morning News, where things are squeaky clean most of the time.

Editorial Director, Hooksexup Media:
Michael Martin

Send us links!


Tags

we recommend

partners