Register Now!
     DISPATCHES
    TK



      Send to a Friend
      Printer Friendly Format
      Leave Feedback
      Read Feedback
      Hooksexup RSS

    Consider the following scenario: It's Saturday, and you feel like going to the movies. You see the latest installment of The Chronicles of Narnia advertised in your local Examiner newspaper, part of a chain whose name has been trademarked in more than seventy cities. You decide to go to your local theater — a Regal, Edwards, or United Artists. You sit through twenty minutes of advertising, followed by the film itself, which has been delivered from studio to theater by a fiber-optic line.
       The underlying theme? Every stage of your moviegoing experience — from production to promotion to distribution to exhibition — was controlled by one man: sixty-six-year-old religious conservative Philip Anschutz.
       Named Fortune's "greediest executive" in 1999, the Denver resident is a generous supporter of anti-gay-rights legislation, intelligent design, the Bush administration and efforts to sanitize television. With a net worth of $5 billion, he is Forbes ' thirty-fourth richest American, two spots above Revlon's Ronald Perelman. Anschutz heads a vast media empire whose assets include the Examiner chain, twenty percent of the country's movie screens, and a sizeable stake in Qwest Communications, the scandal-ridden telecom giant he formerly directed. (Anschutz was accused of helping falsely inflate Qwest profit reports, then making millions by selling his own shares in the company — a claim he ultimately settled by paying millions to charity.)

    promotion

       Anschutz's stake in Hollywood has been growing since 2000, when he began buying the bankrupt Regal, Edwards and United Artists chains and founded two film studios, Walden Media and Bristol Bay. In many areas of the country, the Regal Cinemas chain is the only option for seeing first-run films. Carole Handler, a prominent Los Angeles anti-trust attorney, says this gives Anschutz considerable leverage in his latest domain of conquest. "Anschutz is the person who went and bought the theaters out of bankruptcy," she says. "Don't think that passed unnoticed by the studios."
       Anschutz has gained considerable power in negotiating licensing agreements with the film studios, contracts which impact everything from where a movie is played, to how long it runs, how it's marketed, which upcoming releases are given trailer time, and how revenue is split between the studio and the theater. It is a kind of power, says Handler, that harkens back to the early days of cinema, when studios, distributors, exhibitors and even movie star magazines were concentrated into the same relatively few hands.
       There's a twist, though: Anschutz's politics.
       A heavy contributor to the Republican Party for decades, Anschutz helped fund Amendment 2, a ballot initiative to overturn a state law protecting gay rights, and helped stop another initiative promoting medical marijuana. More recently, he helped fund the Discovery Institute, a conservative Christian think tank that mounted a public relations campaign and financed "research" into intelligent design. He has also supported the Media Research Council, the group that generated nearly all the indecency complaints with the FCC in 2003.


    Ironically, it was Hollywood that saved Anschutz.

    As a friend of his told Fortune, Anschutz "has a latent interest in doing something significant in American Christianity. He is working deliberately and diligently on it."
       Anschutz did not respond to Hooksexup's request for an interview, and he has given only a handful over the past few decades. This is not for lack of an opinion or a story to tell. A devout Presbyterian who grew up in Kansas, Anschutz is married with two daughters and a son. He inherited his father's land investment and oil exploration business, but didn't grow up wealthy; in fact, he gave up his plans to attend law school because the family business was failing.
       Ironically, it was Hollywood that saved Anschutz. After discovering a major oil well in Wyoming, the well caught fire. Anschutz sought to hire Red Adair, the legendary oil well firefighter to put it out, but wasn't able to pay Adair's fee. Anschutz realized he could pay Adair — and make $100,000 on top of that — by selling the rights to the footage to Hollywood.
       Having faced tough times before, Anschutz is probably not overly concerned about the fact that theater attendance was down six percent this year, even in an industry with thin profit margins. Earlier this month Regal reported a forty-three percent increase in fourth quarter profits, a windfall partly credited to another Anschutz venture, the holiday blockbuster and Christian allegory The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
    Narnia has grossed close to $300 million, a far cry from the first film Anschutz produced, 2002's Joshua. A depiction of the Second Coming, Joshua pulled in less than $1.5 million for its studio, Epiphany Films, a specialty label of Anschutz's proselytic-sounding Crusader Entertainment. While websites are usually maintained even for box office flops — 2003's Gigli, for instance — Joshua's site has been taken down, and its URL redirects visitors to the studio's new name, Bristol Bay.
       To some, redirection might be an appropriate metaphor for Anschutz's entire enterprise, which they fear is all about bringing God and conservatism to Hollywood under a more secular and apolitical guise. Or, as Joshua co-producer Bob Beltz told Christianity Today in 2002, "We wanted something that we thought would have more of a mainstream impact, that would expose unchurched people to the person of Christ in a way that they might walk out of the theater saying, 'Is it possible that Jesus could really be that wonderful?'"
       Some have speculated that Narnia might be what Anschutz's friend meant by the "significant" contribution the media mogul wants to make: using his wealth to buy a place for evangelicals in Hollywood. The film's distributor, Disney, initially

    Redemption might be an appropriate metaphor for Anschutz's entire enterprise.

    wasn't interested in Narnia. Gradually, Disney began to realize the Christian allegory's potential appeal among evangelicals, who demonstrated their box-office clout with The Passion of the Christ.
       Anschutz isn't just blurring religious and secular lines with his film, but taking advantage of a softened divide between production and exhibition. In the early days of Hollywood, film studios dominated the exhibition business, obligating independent theater owners to accept bad films in exchange for the right to play good ones. In 1948, the federal government issued the Paramount Consent Decree, forcing the major studios to divest their theater holdings. Recent theater mergers, such as the consolidation of AMC and Loews (the number two and number three chains, respectively) must pass antitrust scrutiny. AMC/Loews, whose merger closed in January, was forced to sell off theaters in key markets such as Boston and San Francisco last year to avoid creating a monopoly.
       "In the 1970s and 1980s, exhibition overbuilt [too many expensive theaters] in shopping centers. The centers declined in value while the rents did not," says Handler. "Then in the 1990s most of the exhibition houses sought bankruptcy. Many emerged from bankruptcy under aegis not of common ownership but of common investment."
       Instead of buying United Artists, Edwards, and Regal Cinema outright, Anschutz avoided antitrust concerns by acquiring their debt, Handler explains. Regal already has a distribution monopoly in many areas of the country, and Anschutz's power extends beyond Regal to joint ventures he has formed with his competitors. His partner, Oaktree Capital Management, is financing Sundance's new art-house chain. Instead of selling off pieces of Regal Cinemas' overbuilt empire, Anschutz launched The 2wenty, twenty minutes of pre-show advertising that launched with a free ad for the military, Enduring Freedom: The Opening Chapter. In 2004, Anschutz merged his pre-show advertising business with AMC's and Cinemark's. The result was National Cinemedia, a company that now runs its ads on more than half of the nation's screens, and whose president is a former co-chairman of Regal Entertainment Group.


         

      

    Comments ( 10 )

    Mar 23 06 at 6:37 pm
    DVW

    I am no fan of conservative excess of recent vintage. However, the article on Anshutz seems to presuppose that mainstream movies should not have any Christian focus. In other words, it supposes that film is a "zero sum" game in which Christian-themed movies signal the end of more edgy, secular entertainment. The tone of the piece, in all fairness, hints of "anti-Christian" prejudice, a frequent source of evengelical angst. Pieces like this suggest that such prejudices are about the only issue where the evangelicals may have a point.

    Mar 23 06 at 8:18 pm
    JS

    Mr. Clark,

    I do not understand the harm here. So what if a few big media companies are owned by conservatives? What about the vast majority of the rest, such as Time Warner (which includes CNN), Viacom and Disney (ABC)? Good god and good grief. Silly, sophmoric and narrow minded.

    Mar 25 06 at 4:10 pm
    AI

    I don't think the two previous correspondents have actually understood the threat here. The article is exposing the practices of someone who is aiming to limit the available movies to those that he deems acceptable. So what if there are other companies, they too can be subjected to these kind of pressures and lo, you have complete diet of "wholesome family fare" whether you want it or not.

    Mar 27 06 at 4:52 am
    mb

    Shrek and Kermit are NOT Disney characters ...

    Mar 29 06 at 7:20 pm
    JR

    There are two Regal complexes within 5 miles of my house. For over three months the Chronicles of Narmia was on two screens in those theatres, starting every half hour, playing about 8 times a day at each theater. On the other hand, Brokeback Mountain played one screen at each cinema starting only three or four times a day at the same time at each theater for about 3 weeks. Thus, while these two regent theaters gave Narmia about 3,000 showings. Brokeback mountain was limited to less than 300 showings. It is not surprising that Narmia made 4 times the money that Brokeback Mountain did when the theaters gave audience every possible opportunity to see Narmia and virtually no opportunity to see Brokeback Mountain. We should keep in mind that while Narmia made back 2 times its investment, Brokeback mountain made back 7 times its investment.

    Mar 30 06 at 12:16 am
    JDM

    This is the EVIL company that bought out Litchfield Company of SC, the company I worked 20 years for. When Regal found out I was gay they were the ones that drove me crazy by firing my staff and putting in their own to spy on me and find any little thing to get me on. I could go on and on about these jerks. In the end I had to quit. They haven't changed a damn bit!

    Mar 30 06 at 3:34 am
    PS

    The more censorship, the less democracy.
    The more democracy, the less censorship.
    True or False?

    So, in Communist Red China, which has a highly censored society, do they have a democracy? No. In fact, the Commie Red Chinese censor from their media and airwaves the exact same things that the religious fundamentalists are trying to censor from American media and airwaves.

    So, if censorship is a sign of a anti-democratic Communist police state, then those people out to censor the same things the Communists censor must be out to impose a anti-democratic police state on all those citizens unfortunate to be in the same society with them...and religion is just a smokescreen to hide their nefarious plans.

    Therefore, who's calling for increased levels of censorship in the United States? Aren't these people anti-democracy, and really Communists, or at least totalitarian Communist sympathizers who share the same Communist mindset?

    I'll repeat, censorship is a sign of a monopolistic dictator. And for censorship to be promoted in the United States indicates someone is out to destroy our democracy, especially with our unique Bill of Rights, and set up their Communist-styled censorship society.

    And I don't care if Citizen Anschutz or Rupert Murdoch claim they are Christians...I know a Communist by watching for someone displaying signs of censorship. And it's not just Anschutz and Murdoch who are behind this evil attempt to takeover our democratic society and turn us into their slaves. The top officials at Clear Channel Communications are also in on the plot. Alberto Gonzales, with his secret, illegal wiretap campaign, is another. The entire leadership of the so-called Christian Coalition are involved in this evil plot. Oh, wait, they are righteous. And righteous folks are never wrong, at least in their minds.

    But what about Jesus Christ? What would he do? Would he join with Citizen Anschutz, Rupert Murdoch or any of the other self-described so-called Christians who are out to censor liberty and freedom in our democracy? Hardly.

    Remember, Jesus was the one censored. He was not the one doing the censoring. Jesus was the one scourged. He was not the one doing the scourging. Jesus was the one put to death. He was not the one with a belief in the death penalty.

    So, the right-wing Christian fanatics can go on claiming they are Christian, but I know the difference. And calling them Communists more fully describes their goal for America. Censorship. Censorship. Censorship. And only a God-forsaking, Christ-forsaking dictator censors. Which means these righteous wingnuts are hardly Christian.

    Apr 01 06 at 5:15 pm
    ASP

    Hi -- I'm sure this is just a typo, but the British Christian crusader against the slave trade wasn't Wilbur but William Wilberforce.

    Apr 02 06 at 10:06 pm
    ted

    scary. why is it the religious right is intent upon marching us all back to nursery school? its a wonder that they procreate.

    Oct 31 10 at 5:16 am
    mauk insurance

    Porfirio, WTF???

    https://insuranceaudio.info

    Add a Comment