Watch: PETA mocks TSA with nudity-filled ad featuring Pamela Anderson
By Ray RahmanNovember 26th, 2010, 6:50 pmComments (9)PETA is no stranger to controversial, nudity-filled advertising. And, as of late, the TSA has become acquainted with a different brand of nudity-oriented controversy. So the latest commercial from PETA, which features undressed travelers and a dressed Pamela Anderson, combines the best of both worlds — all in the name of animal rights.
The spot, titled "Cruelty Doesn't Fly," has Anderson playing a TSA agent with a conscience. As people pass through the sparsely populated airport-security checkpoint, they are stripped of any and all garments made from animals. This, logically, leads to naked people laughing and kissing.
Watch the racy PETA ad in the video below, and compare it to your next encounter with the Department of Homeland Security:
Commentarium (9 Comments)
Strange. That's EXACTLY the way it was the last time I went through an airport. Unfortunately, everyone involved was fat and ugly, including me.
Please no more TSA news. It's overplayed. Thank you.
I disagree. TSA news until they get rid of those fucking body scanners.
@Kale It should continue to remain news until the TSA policies are abolished, you moron.
I disagree (without name calling) It's just the stuff of bad late night monologues. People will put up with it to be safe, they just will.
They probably will put up with it to be "safe" but they shouldn't - there are more important things than being some abstract measure of more "safe" - like having dignity.
As much as I loathe PETA's ad campaigns for chasing shock effects and employing sexist visuals to achieve greater visibility - Nina Hagen FTW!
scan are actually a good compromise, it's the manual searching who should be prohibited! thank god I live in Canada
funny how this discussion is going on right now in the media, but every increase in "security" over liberty from 2001 to 2008 was somehow acceptable. In fact, liberals used to be called unpatriotic for questioning Homeland Security. I wonder what changed in 2009 that suddenly makes discussing this so popular...? It's not the pat-downs -- you can avoid those by going through the scanners. It's not the scanners -- we're told they're safer than the flying itself, supposedly. What changed that made the TSA the bad guys now, and not just "doing their job for our security"...? Hmmmmm.....