Register Now!

Catholic University — a very fine institution that some of my more oblivious relatives suggested I attend to pursue my love of theater — has come up with an ingenious way to battle the college trend of getting super-hammered and sleeping with that guy you met at that thing or whatever: get rid of co-ed dorms! This is what college president John Garvey announced in a Wall Street Journal editorial today, but don't worry: he's just doing it because women are sluts and men are drunken animals:

I know it's countercultural. More than 90% of college housing is now co-ed. But Christopher Kaczor at Loyola Marymount points to a surprising number of studies showing that students in co-ed dorms (41.5%) report weekly binge drinking more than twice as often as students in single-sex housing (17.6%). Similarly, students in co-ed housing are more likely (55.7%) than students in single-sex dorms (36.8%) to have had a sexual partner in the last year-and more than twice as likely to have had three or more.

The point about sex is no surprise. The point about drinking is. I would have thought that young women would have a civilizing influence on young men. Yet the causal arrow seems to run the other way. Young women are trying to keep up-and young men are encouraging them (maybe because it facilitates hooking up).

Some thoughts: 1. If I lived in a dorm full of guys who had no access to women and were madly sexually frustrated, I'd pinch myself to make sure I wasn't dreaming. 2. This will probably encourage your students to drink, Mr. President. Here is the truth: in life, men and women interact with one another. Sometimes, they screw. And they will do this even if they live in neighboring dorms, as opposed to neighboring rooms. Just make sure they know how to avoid getting chlamydia, and you've done your job.

Comments ( 14 )

Jun 15 11 at 12:22 pm
profrobert

I take away different conclusions from his statistics: More adventurous college students want to live in a co-ed dorm and drink. Only the very conservative ones want a single-sex envioronment. Thus, by eliminating co-ed dorms, a number of your potential customers will go elsewhere to college.

Jun 15 11 at 1:15 pm
HeebeeGeebies

I'm guessing that's fine with CU; if you're there to drink and hook-up, go elsewhere.

Jun 16 11 at 10:54 am
profrobert

From my time in academia, that would surprise me. Schools are all about their US News rankings, to the point of fiddling with admit dates (e.g., pushing lesser students to February starts so their SATs don't drag down the stats). If CU restricts its pool by effectively turning away anyone for whom co-ed living is a priority, then it'll have to make up the revenue by taking less statistically desirable students and ultimately take a hit in the US News stats. (And from my experience, religiously run schools are no more principled than their secular brethren in pandering to US News.)

Jun 16 11 at 1:40 pm
Jim Strathmeyer

Actually, all it will cause is now those two types of students will have to live together. Why does this adult think he needs to punish young people for having successful social lives? He obviously shouldn't be in the care of other people.

Jun 16 11 at 2:18 pm
Chariot

Adding to profrobert's comment on the statistics, another problem is that this is self-reported. Students in single-sex dorms are less likely to admit if they've been sneaking out and having sex, as it's actively discouraged there, whereas in co-ed dorms it's generally accepted that some people do that, and there's less reason to hide it.

Jun 15 11 at 2:25 pm
ouo

as long as they still have their penis and vagina, this is not going to work

Jun 15 11 at 2:58 pm
ER

correlation does not imply causation. basically what profrobert said.

Jun 15 11 at 5:28 pm
HeebeeGeebies

profrobert didn't make such an argument.

Jun 15 11 at 6:54 pm
profrobert

No, I didn't, but I do agree with ER's point about it.

Jun 16 11 at 1:31 am
completely

"If I lived in a dorm full of guys who had no access to women and were madly sexually frustrated, I'd pinch myself to make sure I wasn't dreaming" Ha!

I don't have a problem with single-sex dorms. Actually, I can definitely see the appeal, from a woman's perspective, of an all-girl's school. That said, if he thinks that this is going to eliminate binge drinking and casual sex on college campus, he is in for a rude awakening.

Jun 16 11 at 2:24 pm
PeterTheMagnificent

I went to a Catholic undergraduate school before moving on to CUA. Here's the funny part. When coed dorms are eliminated, it doesn't eliminate sex between male and female students. It just forces them to be sneaky about it. But the real kicker is that when a policy like this is passed, gay couples are free to live together whereas straight couples aren't. While I applaud CUA for being so progressive in this respect, that kinda discriminates against the school's heterosexual community.

Jun 19 11 at 3:27 pm
coffeegirl18

I found that seriously funny...it's good that gay couples could live together (since usually they can't). But the hetro crowd is getting descriminated against. I'm an even-even kinda girl everyone should have equal rights.

Jun 17 11 at 4:27 pm
Quizzical mama

I agree that path to pursue is not getting rid of co-ed dorms but promoting comprehensive sex education.

@ PeterTheMagnificent: good point about the discrimination aspect

Jun 19 11 at 3:24 pm
coffeegirl18

Um...you have a bunch of overly horny people living on their own (away from repressive parents) they'll hookup. If they're separated they'll find a way.

Add a Comment