Register Now!

Study: Most religious women use contraception

Good news for advocates of family planning. According to a new study by the Guttmacher Institute, despite condemnation by some religious officials, the vast majority of women who identify as "religious" use contraception. The study primarily focused on various sects of Christianity, and here's what it found. Seventy-four percent of Evangelicals use a "highly effective method" of contraception — that means sterilization, the pill or other hormonal methods, and IUDs — as do seventy-three percent of Mainline Protestants and sixty-eight percent of Catholics, though it would be interesting to see how these numbers compared for women who practice Judaism, Islam, or other Eastern religions.

Here's the study's lead author, Rachel K. Jones, on the data:

"In real-life America, contraceptive use and strong religious beliefs are highly compatible. Most sexually active women who do not want to become pregnant practice contraception. This is true for Evangelicals and Mainline Protestants, and it is true for Catholics, despite the Catholic hierarchy's strenuous opposition to contraception."

While the Pope has recently loosened his stance on condom use (it's now sort of okay to use them only because they're less evil than giving someone HIV), the Catholic church is still staunchly opposed to all of the methods listed above. Good to know pious women aren't letting a man with a funny hat take control of their bodies.

Commentarium (7 Comments)

Apr 14 11 - 2:04pm
Matt

It certainly makes sense to me, I think if you live in the real world and are morally anti-abortion, as many Christians are (even those who are politically pro-choice), the practical position to take would be to be pro-contraception.
In fact, if reliable contraception were readily available, affordable to all and devoid of social stigma then seems likely that abortion would quickly become pretty rare.

Apr 14 11 - 2:25pm
Megan

the best part about all that though is that THIS (amongst many many other things like STD testing and getting check ups) is what Planned Parenthood is all about. abortion takes up a minimal amount of their agenda and yet that is republicans so-called reason for trying to stop funding for it? do these religious Republicans not realize that their wives who are on the pill (so they never have to even deal with the question of whether or not to get an abortion in the first place) are most probably getting it through PP? Plus the fact they have a sliding scale so that people who dont make a lot of money are able to still practice safe sex (and once again, not have to deal with the abortion question) are able to get their meds cheaper and easier with the help of PP.

Apr 20 11 - 11:03pm
AM

I so agree. Also PP can't use any of the government funds toward abortions due to the Hyde amendment to the government is attacking nothing. Most women are on some form of birth control, whether they are religious or not. Unless they are done having sex. I really think that better sex education and providing more birth control would cause abortions to cease to exist.

Apr 14 11 - 5:05pm
Yet Another Matt

Judaism would be an interesting but (probably) boring study seeing as how use of the pill, even for the most orthodox of Jews, is allowed. Condoms are still a no-no, but the pill is a-okay. Basically, Jewish law dictates that as long as the man's seed enters the woman, they have fulfilled their duty. This also means that Jews are allowed to do anything else they desire in the bedroom, just as long as they finish "naturally."

Apr 14 11 - 7:00pm
JF

Somehow, the technicality of the ''as long as'...then it's okay'' seems intricately wrong. What's the point of the ''seed entering the woman'' when the parties involved have no intention of conceiving?

Apr 14 11 - 11:09pm
Yet Another Matt

Well, that's religion for ya. Loopholes and technicalities are a pretty big part of Jewish culture, I've found.

I'm not the most well-versed Jew, but I've talked about the topic with rabbis and others more well-read on the topic than I, but the basic requirement (with intent to conceive or not) rests solely on the man's shoulders. And that requirement is planting the seed. If he were to wear a condom, that would be HIM actively interfering. But if he does what he's supposed to and the woman is taking the pill, he has still fulfilled his duty.

Also interesting, a husband is obligated to sexually satisfy his wife, but not the other way around.

Apr 18 11 - 12:13pm
Kogo

*And that requirement is planting the seed.*

Why?

Religion: Thinks really, really hard about difficult questions and, unswervingly, comes up with shit answers.

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: