Register Now!

A recent McCann study of over 7,000 sixteen- to thirty-year olds — congrats, people in your late twenties: you're still in the same group as high schoolers! — has found that over half of the respondents would rather lose their sense of smell than their technology. Right off the bat, I have a few very important questions: are we talking all technology here? Like electricity and antibiotics and microwave burritos? And would you have to watch the other kids play with their shiny toys, or does everyone lose it? Is this an Amish-country situation, or more like Cormac McCarthy's The Road? I personally think this information would make a big difference.

That being said: duh-huh-huh-huhhhhh. For all the cool things smell can do, like trigger memories or... let you know there are cookies baking somewhere around you, it tends to get lost in the shuffle. And when you're getting lost in a shuffle of five, it's going to be hard to beat Facebook on a list of "things people want." The report notes that what this really boils down to is the ability to connect:

It is clear from the results that technology plays an important role in youngsters' lives and without it they would feel isolated and uninformed.

"It is the glue that binds this generation together and fuels the motivations that define them." said Laura Simpson, Global IQ Director for McCann Worldgroup...

"Young people utilize technology as a kind of super-sense which connects them to infinite knowledge, friends and entertainment opportunities," said Simpson.

Actually — and this especially goes for those what-is-happening-to-my-body high schoolers — I bet knowing your peers had no sense of smell at all would make it much less worrisome connecting offline as well.

Commentarium (14 Comments)

May 26 11 - 4:21pm
BrosephofArimathea

Three points. 1: I have a friend who doesn't have a sense of smell and uses technology. She's doing just fine. 2: With technology, I may one day regain my sense of smell. The reverse situation is ludicrous. 3: "Over half" is basically a coin toss between two options so there is no trend to speak of except for the lack of a trend.

May 26 11 - 5:10pm
PeterSmith

You don't think you could sniff your way to inventing Facebook?

May 26 11 - 4:33pm
BitchesAintShit

Oh god. This just made me hate everyone even more.

May 26 11 - 6:22pm
Ber8

"young people"...?
what age is young, that they're talking about exactly?
i hope the demographics reflect "young people" - as in under the age of 10 with iphones.

May 26 11 - 6:47pm
Man

"congrats, people in your late twenties: you're still in the same group as high schoolers!"

Congrats? I hope you were being sarcastic. This just shows how people in their late twenties are stuck in arrested development.
_
https://googledisappointsme.blogspot.com/

May 26 11 - 7:52pm
Yanqui

The problem here may be in how "infinite knowledge," "friends," and "entertainment opportunities" are defined.
A person who cannot look you in the eye and talk to you without twiddling his/her thumbs on some handheld device is not a "friend."

May 27 11 - 12:25am
anon

Well put!

May 27 11 - 1:13am
completely

But thanks to technology, you can look someone across the world in the eye and talk to them. Pretty remarkable shit. Not the world's faults that you have shitty friends.

May 26 11 - 9:07pm
julian.

This study doesn't really say much despite that it is a very vague "study."

May 26 11 - 10:04pm
Jeremy

most young people dont know how much their sense of taste is affected by their sense of smell.

May 26 11 - 10:31pm
Jo

I was born without a sense of smell. I'm doing just fine. However, it would be very inconvenient if I didn't have a computer or a telephone.

May 26 11 - 10:33pm
G

The question this study asked is pretty vague. If I was given the choice between technology and my sense of smell, I'd have to go with the tech, and not because I missed Facebook. Good luck finding a job where you aren't going to need to use a computer or cell phone at some point.

May 27 11 - 1:11am
completely

...The fact that this doesn't define "technology" is obviously biasing. At what stage is something "technology"? CDs? Records? Instruments? eReaders? Books? Pens?

I'm going with tech, anyway. Humans didn't get where we are because we're so good at sniffing.

May 27 11 - 9:15am
Matt

"humans didn't get where we are because we're so good at sniffing"

"I dunno, these oysters LOOK safe to eat!" ;-)

(although I'm going to go with what I think the author meant, if it's smell vs. smartphone, smell wins, but if it's smell vs. antibiotics, sanitation, etc, then I'd have to reconsider)