Study: Sexy news anchors making men stupid
By Ray RahmanJanuary 25th, 2011, 6:28 pmComments (8)Once, when I was working elsewhere, I had an editor who, despite being fairly intelligent, thought Megyn Kelly could do no wrong. Curious, I thought, that a left-leaning moderate would be so taken by some crazy conservative chick with too much airtime and not enough facts.
Now there are answers; research shows that he's far from alone. A new study concludes that men simply can't concentrate when sexy anchors tell them the news.
And here's the rub: it's not the women themselves but their outfits that are driving men wild to the point of stupidity. The researchers took one woman and had her record two separate newscasts. In one, she wore "a shapeless and loose-fitting dark blue jacket and skirt" with no lipstick or necklace, while in the other she donned "a tight-fitting dark blue jacket and skirt that accented her waist-to-hip ratio," complete with "bright red lipstick and a necklace." Men were then randomly selected to watch only one of these newscasts.
And you can imagine how it went from there. But in case the picture of the semi-attractive woman above has rendered any male readers incapable of critical reasoning, I'll paraphrase: men who watched the frumpy version of the woman recalled “significantly more information" than the other dudes.
It gets more interesting when you compare this with women watching the same newscasts. Ladies watching the sexualized version remembered more than ladies shown the other one.
So what's the lesson here? Go read a fucking newspaper.
Commentarium (8 Comments)
Actually...FOX NEWS make u more stupid...not women...FOX
All the news is biased video/sound bites. The truth rarely is told.
I didn't read this article, but I wanted to comment on the attractiveness of the lady in the picture. Her waist-to-hip ratio is on fire.
Regardless, If I have to listen to propaganda, i want it to come from these hotties instead of blowhards like Olbermann or Bill O'reilly....sir!!!
Isn't it amazing that funds, and sometimes public monies are used to finance a study like this which has no point. Will it change the scope of television? Nope. So why bother? It won't change the way people watch or view the news. Plus it comes with the stigma that ugly people finally have scientific proof that their opinion matters more when everone else could care less.
Epic fail.
Guessing Ray is gay
Everybody knows that the news is intended to control the masses. They use hot women to control us, people! Wake up!
Definitely boobies.