Register Now!

Media

  • scannerscanner
  • scannerscreengrab
  • modern materialistthe modern
    materialist
  • video61 frames
    per second
  • videothe remote
    island
  • date machinedate
    machine

Photo

  • the daily siegedaily siege
  • autumn blogautumn
  • brandonlandbrandonland
  • chasechase
  • rose & oliverose & olive
The Hooksexup Insider
A daily pick of what's new and hot at Hooksexup.
Scanner
Your daily cup of WTF?
Hooksexup@SXSW 2006.
Blogging the Roman Orgy of Indie-music Festivals.
Coming Soon!
Coming Soon!
Coming Soon!
The Daily Siege
An intimate and provocative look at Siege's life, work and loves.
Kate & Camilla
two best friends pursue business and pleasure in NYC.
Naughty James
The lustful, frantic diary of a young London photographer.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: kid_play
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Super_C
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: ILoveYourMom
A bundle of sass who's trying to stop the same mistakes.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: The_Sentimental
Our newest Blog-a-logger.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Marking_Up
Gay man in the Big Apple, full of apt metaphors and dry wit.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: SJ1000
Naughty and philosophical dispatches from the life of a writer-comedian who loves bathtubs and hates wearing underpants.
The Hooksexup Video Blog
Deep, deep inside the world of online video.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: charlotte_web
A Demi in search of her Ashton.
The Prowl, with Ryan Pfluger
Hooksexup @ Cannes Film Festival
May 16 - May 25
ScreenGrab
The Hooksexup Film Blog
Autumn
A fashionable L.A. photo editor exploring all manner of hyper-sexual girls down south.
The Modern Materialist
Almost everything you want.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: that_darn_cat
A sassy Canadian who will school you at Tetris.
Rose & Olive
Houston neighbors pull back the curtains and expose each other's lives.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: funkybrownchick
The name says it all.
merkley???
A former Mormon goes wild, and shoots nudes, in San Francisco.
chase
The creator of Supercult.com poses his pretty posse.
The Remote Island
Hooksexup's TV blog.
Brandonland
A California boy capturing beach parties, sunsets and plenty of skin.
61 Frames Per Second
Smarter gaming.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Charlotte_Web
A Demi in search of her Ashton.
The Hooksexup Blog-a-log: Zeitgeisty
A Manhattan pip in search of his pipette.
Date Machine
Putting your baggage to good use.

The Screengrab

James Bond and the Five Stages of Grief

Posted by Phil Nugent

The British news services really stay on top of developments in the James Bond series, which figures, since it's probably the best contemporary evidence that they used to have an empire. (I expect that within a couple of decades, American news services will show the same obsessive interest in who gets cast to play Bruce Willis's two-fisted grandson in Die Hard VIII: Live Free, Die Hard, and Leave a Good-Looking Corpse.) The latest casting news is that Ukrainian model Olga Kurylenko, who recently starred with a shaven-headed, baffled-looking Timothy Olyphant in Hitman, will play the "sidekick" to Daniel Craig's Bond in what will be the twenty-second installment of the time-honored, recently re-booted franchise. The movie also stars Mathieu Amalric of The Diving Bell and the Butterfly as the villain and features returning performers Judi Dench (as M), Jeffrey Wright (continuing to serve as the most overqualified actor ever to play Felix Leiter), and international man of mystery Giancarlo Giannini, who was last seen in Casino Royale being dragged offscreen after being tasered at Bond's request, but who apparently holds no hard feelings, being one of those adaptable European sophisticates.

It all sounds pretty good, except for a couple of things. First, the director this time in Marc Forster, the almost talent-free auteur of Monster's Ball and The Kite Runner, a man who has proven himself capable of practically anything, so long as it blows. But with Craig and the others in place, how badly can he screw it up, you ask? Well, it's reported that the new movie "is expected to follow on from the events of Casino Royale, with Bond picking up the pieces after being double-crossed by Treasury agent Vesper Lynd. Producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli said Camille 'challenges Bond and helps him come to terms with the emotional consequences of Vesper's betrayal'." This has a creepy touchy-feely aspect to it that might as well be calculated to set veteran Bond fans' teeth on edge. Not that we have any problem with James Bond touching and feeling, but in his own preferred style. For instance, in the opening of Diamonds Are Forever, Sean Connery's Bond came to terms with the emotional consequences of the murder of his wife in the previous film, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, by touching the villain responsible for the foul deed, strapping him to a surgical table, and rolling it into a handy flaming pit, after which he looked as if he felt just fine. And Connery hadn't even been in On Her Majesty
, which just goes to show how he was willing to go that extra mile to come to terms with something that hadn't happened on his watch. The new Bond movie is due to be released this fall, at which point all will become clear, or at least as clear as a James Bond plot ever is. But here's hoping that, even as we speak, Forster isn't shooting a scene with Daniel Craig waking up in his bed in a psychiatric hospital to discover that Dr. Phil is barging through the door. Or if he is, that there's a flaming pit somewhere in the room.


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT

Comments

sean said:

Not too sure why I should take this bit (and any of your others pieces from now on) seriously in any way when you write "First, the director this time in Marc Forster, the almost talent-free auteur of Monster's Ball and The Kite Runner, a man who has proven himself capable of practically anything, so long as it blows".  Can you offer at least a little point of reference for that statement?  

January 8, 2008 11:28 AM

Phil Nugent said:

I'd say that the evidence is on the screen. If you've seen "Monster's Ball" and "The Kite Runner" and think they were really good movies, then, yeah, it would probably make sense for you to skip anything that has my byline (conveniently located at the top of the posts) attached. Life is short.

January 8, 2008 12:03 PM

Tom said:

While I was unable to watch Stay or Monster's Ball, and I haven't (and probably won't) watch Kite Runner, Stranger than Fiction and Finding Neverland were pretty good movies.  I'll give credit to Ferrell and Britt Daniels and the awesome special effects for Fiction, and Johnny Depp and Winslet for Neverland, but I think Forster is just hammering out some mediocre chapters in what should be a talented career.  So, I think Bond won't suffer because of Forster and it may actually be his best movie.

January 8, 2008 1:56 PM

sean said:

I agree with Tom.  

I just think it's poor writing to just assume that everyone apparently knows that Forster is a poor filmmaker.  In essence, your piece is simply a "I don't like his other films, so this film will be terrible", which strikes me more as message board material than an article.

January 8, 2008 3:07 PM

Janet said:

How can you complain about a writer who gave us the delightful mental image of Dr. Phil being pushed into a flaming pit?  Thank you for that, Phil.

January 8, 2008 7:29 PM

Phil Nugent said:

Thank you, thank you. Like Dr. Phil, I'm here to help.

FWIW, I haven't liked Forster's work in the past, but I also didn't think I'd ever like a James Bond movie again until I saw "Casino Royale", and if I didn't believe in the possibilities of redemption and happy surprises I'd probably know better than to see as many movies as I do. Until I see it, you can put me down for being "cautiously optimistic" about the prospects for "JB 22." But I do think that anyone who's suffered through a movie he found as painful as I found "Monster's Ball" has a constitutional right to be gratuitiously snotty about it, and this is a right I gladly extend to anyone who happened to hate a movie that I think is the bee's knees. It's not as if we can petition to get those two hours of our lives back.

January 8, 2008 10:11 PM

Paul Clark said:

I'm not as down on Forster as you are, Phil, but I think his work is pretty nondescript.  THE KITE RUNNER was just about the blandest movie imaginable in which a kid gets sexually assaulted.  Then again, I think Forster's nondescript style might make a pretty good match with the Bond franchise, since at this point the last thing it needs is someone to trick it up visually (though I must admit that the b/w prologue of CASINO ROYALE was a very nice surprise).

I'm more concerned about the actresses they got to play the Bond Girls.  Then again, after Eva Green as Vesper, pretty much everyone would be a disappointment.

January 8, 2008 10:28 PM

in
Send rants/raves to

Archives

Bloggers

  • Paul Clark
  • John Constantine
  • Phil Nugent
  • Leonard Pierce
  • Scott Von Doviak
  • Andrew Osborne

Contributors

  • Kent M. Beeson
  • Pazit Cahlon
  • Bilge Ebiri
  • D.K. Holm
  • Faisal A. Qureshi
  • Vadim Rizov
  • Vern
  • Bryan Whitefield
  • Scott Renshaw
  • Gwynne Watkins

Editor

  • Peter Smith

Tags

Places to Go

People To Read

Film Festivals

Directors

Partners