At The Movies, once hosted by Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper (and before that Ebert and the late, great Gene Siskel), but now starring exactly zero of them, has seen its ratings decline 23% since it went to its much younger co-hosts, Ben Lyons and Ben Mankiewicz. Some of that is being blamed on the new guys, but we're not sure that flies: while Ebert had an aura of authority, for quite a few years before his medical problems he seemed just happy to be at the movies; he wasn't giving a film a thumbs-down unless it reached through the screen and punched him in the face. No, we wonder if, in this short-attention span and instant information digital age, with all the internets and whatnot, it isn't the "Two guys talking about movies for a half-hour" format that's antiquated. No matter how young and hip your co-hosts are, is At The Movies really the sort of television program that can last forever? What do you think?