Register Now!
 
LOG IN  |  SIGN UP
21

true-blood

To talk about True Blood is to talk about sex: barely a scene goes by without something between innuendo and a full-on orgy. This isn't new to vampire fiction, as Latoya Peterson pointed out in a piece for Double X. That the sexuality of the female leads is under heavy scrutiny is no surprise, given how much horror fiction has centered on feminine helplessness. To Peterson, the current crop of pointy-toothed dramas continues the genre's fascination with sexual violence and the idealization of the chaste woman. I can't fault her for taking issue with eroticized depictions of abuse, often against women. But she's wrong to equate the sexual politics of True Blood with those of the abstinent, repressed Twilight.

These two are not the same animal. Twilight's Bella Swan is a virgin until marriage, and the influence of author Stephanie Meyer's Mormon ideals is well-covered territory. The entire series is heavy with the sex the characters can't have; it gets its charge from the tantalizing and unattainable. Sookie Stackhouse, the female lead of True Blood, may have started as a virgin, but soon she, like almost every other character on the show, is getting down, having grimy, sometimes wildly unhygienic sex with her vampire boyfriend Bill. But despite her "transgression," Sookie remains the heroine of the series.

Of course, last season featured the problematic subplot of women, or “fangbangers,” being murdered for sleeping with vampires. Even though the killer was set up as the season's ultimate villain, showing these women getting punished for their sexual activity ran the risk of keeping the old, unfortunate trope alive. But, unlike in traditional horror films where virginity equals salvation for the scantily clad heroine, Sookie not only lost her virginity and lived — she killed the bad guy. And Season 2 has found Sookie getting more and more in touch with her inner wildcat, going after what she wants sexually and in her relationship.

As is Tara, the other main female character, who’s keeping busy in the bedroom and remaining quite alive. Really, there are few abstinent characters on this show, especially now that mysterious MaryAnn, a woman who looks human but definitely isn’t, is throwing parties that turn into Caligula-like orgies. And even the characters who do abstain — and promote more traditional values, like Sarah the preacher’s wife — seem to be sexually smoldering at the core. If anything, repression signifies “evil” in True Blood’s evolving universe.

Arguably, all this transgression could make for a portrayal of sex as simplistic as Twilight's, just reversed. But then True Blood gives us a subplot about newly-made vampire Jessica, once a tightly controlled and religious girl, now a petulant and confused perpetual-teenager. When she gingerly takes home a boy she meets at the town bar and accidentally pops her fangs, it's like every fifteen-year-old boy's nightmare made flesh. And when her new boy sweetly tells her that her fangs are beautiful because they're a part of who she is, it's a rare moment of sweetness amid the hormonal madness.

Jessica is almost the anti-Sookie. She was widely hated last season for being a one-dimensional annoying brat, whose sole reason for existence was to put a kink into Sookie and her vampire lover Bill’s own kink. But this season Jessica is growing up, and the excitement and fear that comes with everyone's introduction to sex has made her the most compelling character on the show. While Sookie was tormented by the choice between two men last season, and is dealing with some often-boring relationship bickering this season, Jessica is eager and hungry to experience all the things she thought she'd missed out on — from making out with boys to telling off her parents. When, in the latest episode, she orders a snack from room service (“male, straight, B-negative”) at a vampire-friendly hotel, you don't think she's sleeping around. You cheer her on.

To a degree, True Blood is confused and confusing when it comes to its portrayal of sex. But the show seems to be growing towards a more natural and nuanced depiction of sexuality, not just for the women but for everyone in the vampire-filled town of Bon Temps. If the show were all bacchanal madness and beefcake adoration, Peterson would be right: we'd have a problem. But as long as we can find a spark of soul amid the profane, watching True Blood should be a guiltless pleasure.

Comments ( 21 )

True Blood for all its gratuitous sex scenes always fails to offend me as a woman, where as Twilight makes me want to scratch my eyeballs out (except then I couldn't see Robert Pattinson...) Well done!

vanessa commented on Jul 14 09 at 5:20 pm

True Blood IS a guiltless pleasure, always! And the constant sex scenes can be a little numbing, but I think that's sorta the point. I also agree that Twilight is overall much more offensive regarding female sexuality! I couldn't stand the catatonically helpless Bella in the Twilight movie (haven't read the books). The female characters in True Blood are diverse and have more layered motivations. And Jessica rocks!

spinal commented on Jul 15 09 at 6:29 pm

Seriously, is this how people spend their time nowadays worrying about the display of sexuality that is shown on True Blood? It's a HBO show, isn't it? It's amazing how sexuality can create such constricting opinions.

Honestly, I would be more worried with the domestic violence/controlling nature that is of Bella and Edward's relationship in the Twilight books that are geared towards young girls, than the fact that True Blood is an adult cable show after all.

True Blood is just campy, vampire entertainment.

Dee commented on Jul 15 09 at 8:23 pm

The best things about true blood this season: jason and jessica. with the former shirtless, please.

beetred commented on Jul 16 09 at 1:09 am

TrueBlood is by FAR my favorite show I have ever seen since i first started watching TV, no contest.
In a way, TrueBlood is more of an extension of the political climate in America right now- the sexually free vs. the sexually repressed, minorities and their rapidly growing support vs. the white, conservative, uptight types. And the latter always looses in TrueBlood, just like the latter always has for the past 40 years. Who can honestly say that they didn't think of evangelicals when they saw the Fellowship of the Sun?

Alan Ball has stated that to mirror America today was one of his intents in creating this show.

I applaud TrueBlood for not only being entertaining, but being laden with metaphors and overtones at the same time.

Corey commented on Jul 16 09 at 9:05 pm

> The best things about true blood this season: jason and jessica. with the former shirtless, please.

Um, would it be too much to ask for *both* of them shirtless?

Zhiro commented on Jul 17 09 at 12:05 pm

I'm glad somebody addressed this. I read Latoya Peterson's piece a few days ago and, though I generally agreed with her assessment of gender and sexual politics in vampire fiction, I really thought she was unfair to True Blood. When I first started watching it, one of the things that pulled me in was the fact that it seemed to eschew the Madonna/whore complex that usually encumbers the genre--in other words, I thought finally some vampire fiction that does not commit all the sins that Peterson complains about. Sookie starts off sexually inexperienced, but not sexually unaware, and her exploration of her sexuality is portrayed as a positive thing. And I LOVED the scene where Jessica becomes embarassed by her fangs. At last, some acknowledgement that sexual curiosity and awkwardness is as much an issue for adolescent girls as it is for adolescent boys. And the men aren't just controlling alphas (creepy AND boring!). I will readily agree with the criticism of Twilight--it truly freaks me out that that series is being read by so many young girls. But True Blood is something completely different--and not surprisingly. It would be pretty weird if Mormon housewife Stephenie Meyer and gay, liberal Alan Ball didn't have pretty different ways of portraying gender and sexuality.

LydiaSarah commented on Jul 17 09 at 4:25 pm

I have not been able to get past on entire show of True Blood and I have tried from the very beginning of the show. The gratuitous sex scenes are unbearable and completely distracting from the plot of the whole show. Neither Twilight or True Blood interest me. I guess I was more of a Lestat fan and into the romance and seduction of a vampire than the sex of one.

Seriously McMillan
yousuckwhenyourerude.com

Seriously McMillan commented on Jul 18 09 at 6:02 pm

I found myself watching this show after a friend showed me and became fascinated with it. The sex scenes are a bit overdone, I think. Since I don't really watch TV otherwise, I was surprised that TV (anything that isn't a movie) had resorted to this. Please note, I'm 20 with conservative values. On the flip-side, though, Twilight bored me to tears, to the point where it was irritating to read just one page, let alone a whole chapter. With that said, it was chaste and I liked that. I got a sense of that sexual energy without it being loooong drawn out scenes describing every thrust and jiggle.

Taka commented on Aug 17 09 at 11:28 am

well, im a 15 year old and i love Twilight AND Trueblood, Twilight is purposely written for young children whereas Trueblood is written for a whole different demographic audience. In my opinion, i think that it is very impossible to compare as the only similarity is there about vampires. Twilight is one of my favourite books (i love the whole series to be honest) and yes the whole idea of chaste till married is over the top but her being 18 is fairly suitable. When your ready, it doesnt really matter what age (law is 16 though) trueblood which is probably not suitable for me, can be overdone with the sex but isnt aswell. Alot of couples will have sex everyday and with them depicting several relationships its easily done having a least one sex scene every episode. I did like the awkwardness of Jessica and Hoyt, the first time is going to be like that and i like how they portrayed something that will happen to a teenage girl and the fact that the first time will hurt. I think both show some realisation and both can be incorporated as i wont wait till im married but i will wait till im ready and that is key. There you go.

nicole commented on Aug 30 09 at 6:30 pm

To be honest, I like the sex scenes and the true vampire was based on sexuality and their sexual attraction.....so here's what I say...NO ONE asks you to watch it. If you don't like it TURN IT OFF...

Jen Little commented on Sep 04 09 at 7:02 pm

Very well said, however you forget to mention that Jessica will remain a "virgin" forever because her hymen wasn't broken until after she became a vampire; as a result every time she has sex it will be her "first time". She will remain a virgin until the end of time which is a fabulous metaphor for what the Twilight series wants it's reader's to believe; that sex is always bad and in order to be a "good" girl you should never give it up until marriage. Jessica was made a vampire against her will, but once she was made she got curious about all those things which were denied her by her parents. However, sex is still something that she will never enjoy which is what certain groups want young girls to believe.

naomi commented on Sep 04 09 at 7:19 pm

The only thing confusing is why a show has to be one dimensional or all-consuming in its fictional portrayal of anything. True, some shows try to push buttons or try to make you think. This isn't one of them. Don't overthink these things, guys. It's not some statement about feminism or sexism. Just enjoy it!

sjbe commented on Sep 04 09 at 7:47 pm

Twilight is appropriate for tweens and True Blood is very grown up. (a bit concerned about our 15 year old poster above but I'm not her mother...I make sure my 13 year old son, with whom I read the Twilight series, watched the movie and even visited Forks, Washington is no where near-by when I watch True Blood). Myers Mormon views are certainly not a bad role model for young women and will have about as much persuasive value with anyone over the age of 17 as anything else. True Blood, like the Sopranos, Entourage and Sex in the City is an enjoyable show for adults. Well written, witty, suspenseful and fun to watch.

Susan commented on Sep 04 09 at 7:56 pm

great article. lets see what this brave HBO alan ball masterpiece for what it is doing.
widening the debate about sexual conservative taboo in one of the greatest freedom loving nations on earth.

the suppresion of female sexuality is one of the tools of of partiarchy.

women have been taught to lie about themselves too long for fear of ridicule , stigma and actual harm.

recent retro puritanism [anti sensuality and liberation in USA] is similar to retro-active Islamic fundemntalism, weird and without historic precedent and merely politically motivated and divisive and oppressive in nature.

jackie commented on Sep 04 09 at 8:07 pm

Sure, True Blood has gratuitous sex/nudity, but at least it's a show with a heart!

Other HBO shows, like Californication, I can't STAND. Just watching some womanizer boning every female he meets is nowhere near as compelling, plot-relevant, and beautifully shot as the romance scenes between Sookie & Bill, for example.

TB fan commented on Sep 04 09 at 9:33 pm

i am looking forward to every new episode of true blood

John commented on Sep 21 09 at 10:49 pm

i absolutely love this show. i agree with everyone that Trueblood shows female sexuality much better than Twilight. who says women dont enjoy sex? twilight is a nice fantasy series for young teens, but trueblood just portrays real relationships so much better. bella swan's character drives me insane compared to the opinion filled and independent sookie stackhouse.
i havent seen any of the second season yet, and i cant wait.
trueblood is the perfect mixture of sexuality, love and drama. im addicted!

ali_c commented on Oct 21 09 at 9:01 pm

I am truly at a loss as to why True Blood is so popular. I barely made it through the first episode, and I found myself here because I was very curious as to what others find so fascinating with the show.

I don't have a problem with sex (I'm a Scorpio for crying out loud) but I find that some shows depend on it way too much. And I can see why. It's an easy tool to use, and it's a gurantee of viewers since sex sells so much. But why can't it be used to spice a story up once in awhile, rather than a focus? That is what I found in True Blood. I wound up bored out of my mind from the constant sex scenes and sex talk. I am married, I have sex, big deal. Give me something original. Give me a story, give me some real plot. Don't use sex as something central, that's too easy.

I understand and completely respect the sexuality and sensuality of vampires, but this is ridiculous. You can have sex in a show and be creative with it. This is not creativity, this is a case of writers throwing it in every chance they get just because they can and people will like it. I need more than that.

Alexandra commented on Oct 24 09 at 11:28 pm

I agree with the above comment. I too am married, and even my husband agrees with me that this show has gone way over the top with the sex. There is a way to tell a good story without resorting to cheap theatrics and porno-film type scenes to do it. If you want some real positive sexuality for women then you don't start by making them behave like whores.

Chris M commented on Nov 27 09 at 2:31 am

have you people actually read the books??? I mean come on, if you haven't read the books don't watch the show/movie! there is sex in twilight you just have to read the entire series and understand that it was written for teenage girls who shouldn't be having sex in the first place. I mean look at the the young girls that are having kids and their parents are taking care of the children...
i mean come on...
its just a book!!!

someone who reads commented on Jun 08 10 at 8:39 am

Leave a Comment