Register Now!

Media

  • scanner scanner
  • scanner screengrab
  • modern materialist the modern
    materialist
  • video 61 frames
    per second
  • video the remote
    island
  • date machine date
    machine

Photo

  • slice slice with
    giovanni
    cervantes
  • paper airplane crush paper
    airplane crush
  • autumn blog autumn
  • chase chase
  • rose &amp olive rose & olive
Scanner
Your daily cup of WTF?
ScreenGrab
The Hooksexup Film Blog
Slice
Each month a new artist; each image a new angle. This month: Giovanni Cervantes.
ScreenGrab
The Hooksexup Film Blog
Autumn
A fashionable L.A. photo editor exploring all manner of hyper-sexual girls down south.
The Modern Materialist
Almost everything you want.
Paper Airplane Crush
A San Francisco photographer on the eternal search for the girls of summer.
Rose & Olive
Houston neighbors pull back the curtains and expose each other's lives.
chase
The creator of Supercult.com poses his pretty posse.
The Remote Island
Hooksexup's TV blog.
61 Frames Per Second
Smarter gaming.
Date Machine
Putting your baggage to good use.

The Screengrab

Roger Ebert Knows What’s Worth “Knowing”

Posted by Scott Von Doviak

The fact that Roger Ebert gave the latest Nicolas Cage vehicle Knowing a four-star review is not all that surprising. It’s not like he’s ever held his top rating in reserve for the Chinatowns and Godfathers of cinema; recent four-star reviews include Watchmen, Lakewood Terrace and Oliver Stone’s W. In addition, Ebert has always been a big fan of a previous effort from Knowing director Alex Proyas, Dark City. What’s a little more surprising and unusual is Ebert’s follow-up, published two days after his initial review, in which he expresses astonishment at the overwhelmingly negative critical reception the movie has received.

Knowing is among the best science-fiction films I've seen -- frightening, suspenseful, intelligent and, when it needs to be, rather awesome.” That’s the first sentence of Ebert’s review. Those of us who have not been overly impressed by Nicolas Cage’s career choices of the past decade or so already have reason to be skeptical. “With expert and confident storytelling, Proyas strings together events that keep tension at a high pitch all through the film,” Ebert continues. “Even a few quiet, human moments have something coiling beneath. Pluck this movie, and it vibrates. Even something we've seen countless times, like a car pursuit, works here because of the meaning of the pursuit, and the high stakes.”

It didn’t take long for Ebert to discover that his enthusiasm was not universally shared amongst his critical brethren. “Either I'm wrong or most of the movie critics in America are mistaken,” Ebert writes in his follow-up article. “This is astonishing. Let's suppose I was completely wrong. Even if I was how bad could the possibly movie be? Half as good as the slasher film Shuttle? A third as good as Last House on the Left?” Ebert does understand how many of us feel about Cage these days. “Some readers said they avoid his movies on principle. Many found him guilty of over-acting. A critic was quoted who referred to his ‘fright wig,’ which is just mean-spirited snark.”

Ebert also says critics had problems with the Biblical parallels in this end-of-the-world thriller. I have to confess I haven’t found the time in my schedule to squeeze in a viewing of Knowing myself, but let’s see what a few of our leading luminaries had to say. Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly calls the movie “so inept that you may wish you were watching an M. Night Shyamalan version of the very same premise.” A.O. Scott of the New York Times notes: “If your intention is to make a brooding, hauntingly allegorical terror-thriller, it’s probably not a good sign when spectacles of mass death and intimations of planetary destruction are met with hoots and giggles.” Says Ty Burr of the Boston Globe, “It's a Nicolas Cage movie, so, admit it, you're expecting crazy. You have no idea.”

Ebert isn’t completely alone, though. Todd McCarthy of Variety calls Knowing a “not-bad supernatural-tinged sci-fier that has more on its mind than the run-of-the-mill effects-driven extravaganza.” What say you, Screengrab readers? The movie topped the box office this weekend, so surely somebody has seen it. Let us know what you thought in the comments.

Related:
Roger Ebert Gives Himself Thumbs Down
Abel Ferrera Would Like Werner Herzog and Nicolas Cage to Please Die in a Fire


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT

Comments

Steve C. said:

I saw it. It's shit. What else do you need to know?

March 25, 2009 2:46 PM

horseblinders said:

I'd be very interested indeed to know what Armond White thinks of this movie. Could it possibly scale past the peak previously reached by The Transporter 3?

March 25, 2009 3:25 PM

faisal said:

holy f***in s***! that movie redefined the word BAD!

Main Entry:bad

Pronunciation:\ˈbad\

Function:adjective

Inflected Form(s):worse  \ˈwərs\ ; worst  \ˈwərst\

Etymology:Middle English

Date:14th century

1: Knowing(The 2009 discraceful excuse for a movie starring the ever so horrible Nicholas Cage)

2: failing to reach an acceptable standard : poor <a bad repair job> b: unfavorable <make a bad impression> c

March 28, 2009 3:04 AM

Jason said:

I saw it today, and I thought it was pretty freakin' cool.  Silly, but extravagantly, stylishly so, and fans of "Dark City" will see a lot of that great film here.  Weird, creepy, goofy (and Nicolas Cage himself is all three of those things as well, making him the perfect choice to play the protagonist), and pretty amazing in parts.  I dug it.

March 30, 2009 3:40 AM

Bob said:

The movie was awful, and I felt duped having seen it solely on the strength of Ebert's review.  It lasted two hours but felt like four.  At some point the utter ridiculousness of the plot and its characters lead me to stop caring about the movie and to start wondering how the hell the project ever got off the ground.  It's funny.  There are always little clues that a movie's going to be bad.  You see a scene or an actor do something that wouldn't have made it past a better director/screenwriter.  But in Knowing, what started off as a trickle of bad choices, became a tidal wave of garbage.  Merely stupid doesn't cut it.  Merely bad doesn't go far enough.  I left feeling swindled.  If this sounds like your kind of movie experience, by all means, check it out.  

March 31, 2009 12:56 PM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  

Add

in
Send rants/raves to

Archives

Bloggers

  • Paul Clark
  • John Constantine
  • Vadim Rizov
  • Phil Nugent
  • Leonard Pierce
  • Scott Von Doviak
  • Andrew Osborne
  • Hayden Childs
  • Sarah Sundberg
  • Nick Schager
  • Lauren Wissot

Contributors

  • Kent M. Beeson
  • Pazit Cahlon
  • Bilge Ebiri
  • D.K. Holm
  • Faisal A. Qureshi
  • Vern
  • Bryan Whitefield
  • Scott Renshaw
  • Gwynne Watkins

Tags

Places to Go

People To Read

Film Festivals

Directors

Partners