wow, you must really be god's gift to women, huh, stud?

"Jejune": I haven't seen that word for twenty years...

Do you like your girlfriend?  

Of course he likes his girlfriend! dont you know that you only want to glaze the face of the woman you love.

Christ,

"adore" What a flimsy thing to say.

yes, but do you lurve her?

Zeigesty -- your comments about women show such a deep lack of comprehension I'm surprised you even have the gall to write this blog publicly. It makes you seem extremely unattractive. Kind of like the saddo in your cartoon: skinny, eyes glazed over, sweating at the prospect of sex, bulging Adam's apple. Yuck.

You do? That's such a turn off. Actually, no, let me restate that: a person would have to be mildly turned on to be then turned off -- can't see that happening with you.

I know you write some of your posts with this "arch" tone, perhaps thinking that you can invite people to read you ironically, but actual this does nothing to hide your misogyny. Pathetic.

My "impression" is based on what you write and make public -- which is all demeaning to women, and which indicates a fear and lack of sophistication so deep I wonder that you can function as a human being. I haven't seen anything in any of your posts to contradict this "impression" yet. But if you hate everyone equally, does that include yourself? It should. If you could summon up some of that self-loathing in a post you might actually write something with some truth to it.

I know you are, but what am I?

He he. Getting a rise out of you was just. so. easy.

A "feminist" who wants to spunk in his "girlfriend's" face? Hmmm. Doesn't compute.

You say your job is write about sex in an entertaining and honest way? Then try being entertaining. Or honest. The screed above is actually the most honest I think you have been, as it reveals the inflated, injured ego that seems to be driving you. You choose to blog. You put this drivel out into the world. You gots to take your smack downs, especially when so very richly deserved.

I just forced myself to read your "snark" post, by the way. If you want to throw words like "sophmoric" (sic) around try developing one idea, and, I don't know, throw in an original thought, and -- just a suggestion -- try avoiding those pesky cliches and you never know, you might just have something.

Shit -- I just had a terrifying thought: maybe writing about jizzing in women's faces, or how you know what women want better than they do, is actually the pinnacle of your intellectual endeavors. Oh, oh, that's sad. Now I just feel sorry for you.

Still, no one is forcing me to read, so from now on I won't. You don't deserve the page views. Goodbye, Zeitgeisty. I hope that one day you get the therapy you seem to so badly need.

I have to agree with the above post.  

Especially the part: "a 'feminist' who wants to spunk in his "girlfriend's" face?

I love women is a response used by many when confronted by misogynistic behavior.  So is, "I'm a misanthrope." as if that explains the behavior away.

Your presentation of jizzing in your lady's face sounds kind of douchy in a misogynist way.  

I guess maybe you just write like an egocentric jerk.

Sorry again, but you don't seem to have any sense of self-reflection.

Fuck, what a bunch of self-righteous moral absolutists are Zeitgeisty's critics. Did any of you scrape higher than a C+ in your second-year gender studies course? If you had, perhaps you would recognise the dissapointing prejudice of your essentialising views of sexuality. As Zeitgeisty points out himself, some women might, in fact, enjoy what he enjoys? And what does it matter to you if they do? Precisely why are Zeigeisty's detractors so threatened by his configuration of sexuality?

'Feminism' at least taken as the recycled first-wave sense that seems to masquerade as a definition in this forum, becomes a reductive and restrictive term when it delimits what forms of 'female' (insofar as that term retains critical legitimacy any longer) behavior are 'appropriate' and those that are not.

It's so boring to even have make this observation.

You know, Dood, the problem is this:    you     are     not     funny.

This bit of yours is supposed to be satirical and humorous, tongue in cheek, whatever. Try something else; some other topic about which you might be more reliably funny, like miniature golf. Besides, trying to slide past responsibility for your fetish by getting all jokey-jokey about it is pathetic. You don't want them to kiss you? GFY.

Good for you Zeitgeisty for standing up for the women who like it in the face!  You're a REAL feminist now!!!!

HA!

You equate not liking facials to being uptight?

Its a good thing we have such open minded people in the world like you.  You remind me of Eric Schaeffer.

ryddlyr, I also find your comment to be extremely boring. But not as boring as Zeiteisty.

What does finding this crap misogynist have to do with evangelicals?  By your logic you are using "superficial judgments" and ascribing them to titles like "evangelicals" and "morons" Would I be so wrong as to label you hypocritical?  

And as a woman I feel like I have the ability to determine whether or not something is misogynist, just having grown up with the perspective as a woman.  An ability as a man I don't think you have the capacity to truly understand.  

Its like you didn't even read what I wrote.

I'm not defending evangelicals, I'm saying if you don't want me to label you "misoginistic" don't label me and compare me to an evangelical.  Complaining about other people "labeling" you and then labeling other people for what they believe makes you a hypocrite.    

I have to admit, when I first started reading this blog, I thought the tone was sort of faux frat boy--intentionally self-conscious and ironic and all that, but just a bit chest-thumping. i read the other bloggers, and dipped in to Zeigeisty's only occasionally. (I'll admit it. As a gal who loves me some boy ass action, the "Ass Bangin' " post might have tipped me in the direction of feeling it was a bit OTT fratty.

But . . . the blog has grown on me. Sure, sexuality is discussed in a "heh heh" sort of way, but in fact that's how most of us grown-ups talk about stuff that's important. It's funnier than all holding hands and reading Camille Paglia and shit.

To the subject at hand--who cares if playing with cum is feminist? I'm a red-blooded self-esteem-possessing toppy bitch (which I think = feminist, right?) and I am greatly amused by playing with my boyfriend's cum. On the tits,. on the ass, mainly in the mouth with just enough sprayed over the face so that he has something to scoop up at feed me . . . it's all good. If sex can't be silly and fun and messy, I don't want to play.

It's funny how the second a man states his sexual preferences and dislikes out in the open, he is immediately labeled as misogynistic. While if women attempt the same thing, we're talking progressive. I don't know how many times I've heard stories from women of how bad some guys were, poking and proding them to the point of discomfort. To me this was the same thing. It's done in humor, who said it needed to sound appropriate (what is appropriate to begin with). As far as the facial thing goes, I've had girls who approached me on the matter, and never did our politics come into play. That's the great thing about sex. Keep them coming zeitgeisty. (no pun intended)