Who doesn't enjoy a good symposium? Wait, let me rephrase that. Who doesn't enjoy a bunch of brilliant games journalists pontificating on the purpose, methods, and changing nature of what they do? If you're into video games enough to be reading 61FPS, there's a good possibility that, like me, you have an invested interested in the vaguely-defined field of games journalism. And perhaps the most heavily debated element of this profession is the review score; after all, how many times have you seen someone completely lose their shit when a game they love (and possibly have never played) is rated lower than a 9? This topic of game reviews has been on the minds of games journalists N'Gai Croal, John Davison and Shawn Elliott (though I guess he's a former journalist if you want to be technical) for quite some time, and only came to light recently through a multi-part discussion on N'Gai's excellent Level Up blog. His own introduction to the series should give you a good idea as to what areas their conversation covered:
Are reviews primarily a consumer guide, or should they serve another purpose? Do review scores deter intelligent discussion of videogames? Is the presence or absence of a review score the only difference between a reviewer and a critic? What is the role of the reviewer when the Internet is democratizing published opinion? How should reviews and reviewers evolve in light of the emergence and growth of Flash games, small games, indie games and user-generated games?
This series is a definite must-read if you're interested in the review score phenomenon, or plan on reviewing games yourself one day.
Read More...