Register Now!

Media

  • scanner scanner
  • scanner screengrab
  • modern materialist the modern
    materialist
  • video 61 frames
    per second
  • video the remote
    island

Photo

  • slice slice with
    giovanni
    cervantes
  • paper airplane crush paper
    airplane crush
  • autumn blog autumn
  • chase chase
  • rose &amp olive rose & olive
Scanner
Your daily cup of WTF?
ScreenGrab
The Hooksexup Film Blog
Slice
Each month a new artist; each image a new angle. This month: Giovanni Cervantes.
ScreenGrab
The Hooksexup Film Blog
Autumn
A fashionable L.A. photo editor exploring all manner of hyper-sexual girls down south.
The Modern Materialist
Almost everything you want.
Paper Airplane Crush
A San Francisco photographer on the eternal search for the girls of summer.
Rose & Olive
Houston neighbors pull back the curtains and expose each other's lives.
chase
The creator of Supercult.com poses his pretty posse.
The Remote Island
Hooksexup's TV blog.
61 Frames Per Second
Smarter gaming.

Date Machine

Hooksexup Confessions: It's all about the looks stupid!!...plus the Daily Throb!

Posted by zeitgeisty
 This morning I was sifting through the Dating Confessions section and came across this gem…

 "Men: let me tell you something. You've got ten seconds to impress women. In those ten seconds, we check your hair, your clothes, and your shoes. If you pass that initial check, you have five minutes in which we decide whether or not you're attractive, friend material, or a loser. Don't think that you can show up to a date wearing a gammy T-shirt and we'll fall all over you by virtue of your witty banter. Because by the time the banter comes out, you're already either a friend or a loser." 

So, what is the underlying message? Apparently appearance is pretty much the be end and end all’ when it comes to initially choosing a partner. Witty banter, intelligence, repartee…if you’re not up to snuff as far as your looks are concerned, the best you can hope for is friend status. Although, one might feel a tad put off after reading this, I feel the author is pretty dead on. 

Speaking directly to this issue, the question I usually like to throw out there is…

'What would you rather have, love at first sight, or have someone grow on you like a fungus?'

The overwhelming response from my female friends is the 'fungus'. Now I know this is total horseshit. No one could possibly prefer the fungus over the fast beating heart, and butterflies in the stomach you get when you are truly knocked out by someone. Still I hear back from my gal pals;

'Well the love at first sight 'thing' usually burns out fast, but a slow growing relationship stands more of a chance of lasting'.

Again phooey! That would mean you'd be trading one of the few natural perks of being human - overwhelming passion and excitement, for the stability and sleepy comfort you could get from a pair of old shoes.

My opinion, is in order for a relationship to work, it has to initially be based on looks. Of course I'll hear that this is a shallow and juvenile way of seeing things, but I assure you it's not. It's mere logic. How can you expect a relationship to truly get off the ground if it's not based on carnal obsession and animalistic lust? If one constructs, or cobbles together some sort of pact with a partner based on mutual respect, or similar mindset, then what happens when someone comes along that truly blows you away?

In other words, the relationship is vulnerable.

Now I'm not saying that looks, sex and aesthetic bonding is the whole enchilada, I'm just saying that it must be the starting off point. All the other stuff follows suit.. or doesn't, but to settle for comfort and stability serves no one in the end.

I am aware that certain women have this innate need for stability and long-term intimacy, and that some are willing to forego passion and lust in lieu of something they feel outweighs such 'secondary' needs. However, this is mere convention. We should not shackle ourselves to this perceived wisdom. It's actually destructive. One should absolutely know for sure that your partner views you as the pinnacle of all things attractive, sexual, and powerful. I mean what would the alternative to that belief be? Perhaps that somewhere inside, she harbors another image of perfection, or worse yet some specific person she knew before, that probably dumped her and left her with a broken heart.

Now some may argue that passion doesn't last, that it eventually settles down into routine, but I disagree. True passion and attraction do not fade. If that was the case, then why are so many people walking around still carrying torches for the past loves of their lives, constantly comparing their present relationships to them, holding them up as standards to be measured against?

In other words, true passion never dies, it stays with you forever..

Besides which, what would you rather have, an overwhelming 'fuck frenzy' that settles down naturally, or a constant trickle of hum drum intimacy? No . Personally, I wouldn't want anyone to think they were 'settling' for me. I can't understand anyone who would want that.

Some people are so lonely that they just need that companionship. They can't be alone in their lives. They're like rhesus monkeys that constantly need someone to grab onto. It doesn't matter really who it is, they could be some arbitrary choice. This is maddening to me. I also don't believe in the assertion that if you find someone personally interesting, or intellectually stimulating that this can be the basis for a satisfying relationship. If this were the case, tell me why there are millions of forlorn 'interesting' and 'intellectual' nerds out there being dumped on their collective asses each day by their girlfriends, because she found some hotter guy to bone?.

It is about aesthetics...

Yes you can talk about Schopenhauer and analyze Hitchcock, and wax philosophical over societal and moral issues, but if you don't wanna fuck the person to death that you're bullshitting about all this stuff with, then where's the climax? What's the point?

One might ask the question, 'What about the really ugly ones, are they doomed?' I say most probably not. I actually believe that practically everyone has someone out there that would find them devastating. Ok.. Maybe not the elephant man, or some guy with a horn growing out of his forehead, but practically everyone. I mean, I've seen the most boring looking guy with some googly eyed girl on his arm looking up at him worshipfully. It's all about aesthetic connection.

We all have our own little codes implanted in us, about what we find find personally attractive. Some are banal... actually most are banal. Some are more esoteric and specific, but we all have these images in our heads as to what constitutes beauty, so why settle? In the long run it's a big mistake. This misguided view of relationships is the reason the porn industry is through the roof, the reason why vibrators are flying off the shelves, and the cause of much misery believe me.

So next time you start thinking that the fungus would be the better option to lust at first sight, I suggest buying a can of tough actin' Tinactin and look for another Mr. Goodbar..

 

 

Bodacious, british babe.... actress Gemma Bissix

Sex with someone I love - The MASTURBATION file

The Greatest Online Dating story - The PERSONALS file

'But baby I HAVE to put a profile up, it's required!!' - The GIRLFRIEND file

BITE ME! - Snark.

My first kiss...a remembrance of thing past

Feel the paste in you face - The FACIAL file

Talk dirty to me!!

I abstain! The fear to fuck

The unvarnished TRUTH about dating on the internet.

BITE ME!!!

Pontifications on the bangin' of ass - The ANAL file

The brass ring

 


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT

Comments

Oliver Miller said:

I am always inspired by comments that reveal that I would never want to talk to/hang out with the person in the first place.  Yeah, looks are important, and I'm as shallow as the next guy, but...  You're checking out my SHOES?  "Don't think that you can show up to a date wearing a gammy T-shirt and we'll fall all over you by virtue of your witty banter. Because by the time the banter comes out, you're already either a friend or a loser."

Here's a simple response:  fuck you.  I would never want to hang out with you.  After death, you will be consigned to some as-yet-unnamed circle of hell reserved for Manhattanites who do things instantly examining a person's SHOES upon meeting them.

I'll stick to the witty banter and wearing whatever the fuck T-shirt I want, thanks.  And if I met a girl and she's cute and witty, then I'd like to fuck her.  And if she's wearing a 'gammy' -- which is properly spelled 'gamey' -- T-shirt, then all the better and more endearing.

Bonus note:  hey, Hooksexup, if you hire me for this blog, this is exactly the sort of thing that I'll be writing.  Consider this to be your free preview.  -Oliver

September 11, 2008 3:36 PM

zeitgeisty said:

hahahaha!!!...  I agree with the 'fuck you' part.. WHo knows maybe it's a New York thing, but it is looks obsessed...

Also, Hooksexup.. I fully endorse Oliver Miller as the next Date Machine blogger.... Let's get that done.

September 11, 2008 3:50 PM

Oliver Miller said:

I mean -- I am fully shallow.  I am fully look-obsessed.  It's horrible and I'm embarrassed about it.  But I don't get that people care about...  about...  STUFF.  And I'm not some crazy hippie.  I just don't get it.

Example:  I drive a shitty car.  It's got dents; it's a Honda; my dad gave it to me and I love it.  I could buy a new car, but why would I?  I had a date the other day and at work, my co-workers were looking at my car and were like "You're gonna show up for a date in THAT??"  

I was completely taken by surprise.  I continually forget that people care about things like cars, shoes, your 401k plan, what restaurant you take them to, etc...  And I replied:  "Oh Jesus, really?  Well, if she's so awful that she cares about what kind of car that I show up in, then that'll just speed up the process of me realizing that I hate her."

And they couldn't even reply, they were so weirded out by what I said.  Is that such a weird thing to say?  Really?

I also endorse me as the next dating blogger.  It's been too long, and I miss writing about this shit and telling people to fuck off.  Sam; Will; everyone; let's make this happen.

September 11, 2008 4:11 PM

zeitgeisty said:

Yeah... would be nice to get another lightning rod in here and get the heat off of me for a change...

September 11, 2008 4:21 PM

anathema_teatime said:

Yeah, I was wondering if a "gammy" T-shirt was one that smelled of gammon. Because I lurves me some processed pig products. So, ya know, that would be a plus.

Also, anyone who doesn't appreciate my 24-year-old car with the giant pirate flag stickers and the ripped upholstery is undeserving of my sweet, sweet loving. Or does that "cars and shoes and gold-plated high-thread-count-underpants make you sexy" thing only apply to guys? I get confused sometimes . . .

September 11, 2008 4:52 PM

chelseascreen said:

I actually agree with you on this one.

When you go to Asian countries where they actually CARE about their appearance, and then back to the United States where everyone is wearing sweatpants and T-shirts, you really get a feeling that taking care of your appearance isn't just about being shallow, its saying something about your personality, that you care about yourself and other people enough to maintain an attractive physical appearance.  

I think that dressing well and maintaining good hygienic habits can make a person more attractive than an stereotypically attractive person.  You would think this would be common sense but in Boston, it often is not.  

September 11, 2008 6:12 PM

Oliver Miller said:

Really?  You often meet men who are wearing sweatpants?  I've lived in the really deep South for the last four years; I've never seen anyone wearing sweatpants; in fact, I've never seen anyone wearing sweatpants, except to go jogging, since 1989.  And so:  I think you're full of crap.  Not in what precisely you say, but in your example, and in your attutide.  You remind me of some person who went to Europe for six months and comes back complaining about the coffee:  "Oh GOD EUROPEAN COFFEE IS SO MUCH BETTER.  You guys don't even know...  You don't even kow.  American coffee is so not good.  But you wouldn't understand.  Anyway, whatever; let's talk about something else."

Whatever.  It's not a problem to hang out with people who don't wear sweatpants, if that's a big concern.  I'm sure you can find many a bar in Boston where they don't wear them.

This type of bullshit 'this is problem' issue reminds me of the original girl with the 'guys, don't wear crappy T-shirts' comment.  ...Baby?  It's not a problem.  Is this a problem for you?  There are hundreds of bars that you can go to in New York where the guys will have perfect haircuts, perfect shoes, and perfect clothes.  They'll talk to you, pretend to laugh at your jokes, fuck you, and then never call you again.  Wherein is the problem?  ...I must be missing something.

This completes my audition for this blog.  You are welcome.

September 11, 2008 6:31 PM

aghmprettyok said:

European coffee IS so much better.  It really is.

September 11, 2008 7:13 PM

Toluca_86 said:

I've known guys who believe themselves not to be too look-based.  I'm not sure if I believe them, but I don't think I automatically call bs either...

Me... I'm fairly look-obsessed.  But do I decide whether or not I'd fuck a guy within the first 5 minutes of meeting him?  Not always.

Also, I've heard for some people the kind of animal lust and passion you are concerned about /does/ grow over time with the "fungus people".  So it's not really a there at the start or else never there kind of situation...

September 11, 2008 7:22 PM

zeitgeisty said:

yeah, aside from people I see going back and forth to the gym sweat pants aren't a big fashion statement here in NYC...

Here in Manhattan, people usually go by 'types'.. wall street type, hipster type, preppy type.. people are looking out for the ultimate dude or dudette who typifies their favorite type...

September 11, 2008 8:00 PM

aghmprettyok said:

Yeah in Boston the most prevalent type is baseball hat wearing  Red Socks fans with beer guts and goatees.  

September 11, 2008 9:55 PM

recycledbrooklyn said:

I get the distinct sense that some of the "dialogue" here is the same person under different names.  

September 11, 2008 11:02 PM

zeitgeisty said:

What does that even mean?

September 11, 2008 11:19 PM

dvaleriey said:

I'm in favor of handsome!  If a nice looking, smart, interesting man screws you over, you can sigh and look back at your varied sexcapades with nostalgia.  If a troll does you dirty, there is nothing but shame.  

I've observed that self-professed "nice guys" who are homely are often the first to cheat because they get befuddled and weak with ANY female attention.  Appealing gentlemen are used to it and I've had good luck with hot boy loyalty.  

September 12, 2008 10:03 AM

zeitgeisty said:

I think you're dead on there.... I never cheat - and I'm a total dreamboat!! - seriously it's so true, the ugly douchebags are the ones constantly dawgin' around...

You know why? I think that women would least suspect an ugly douchebag of cheating... It's the hot ones that always get the mistrust.

September 12, 2008 10:22 AM

Toluca_86 said:

I've known hot guys and average ones who cheated on their gfs.  In fact, according to various studies half the married male population has cheated (and 1/3rd of the female population).  So what does that do to your theory?

September 12, 2008 4:27 PM

CONFESSION OF THE DAY

CONFESS HERE!

ABOUT THE BLOG

DATE MACHINE explores the triumphs and tragedies of your dating confessions. Look here for commentary, dating advice, and our own salacious (or ridiculous) dating stories.

OUR BLOGGERS

FishnetsAndLight

Professional Dominatrix, lapsed English major and token black chick extraordinaire. I'm also a great big perv. Bend over.

Location:New York, New York
Looking for: Those who aren't too afraid.

Zeitgeisty

I'm an existentialist trapped in the body of a rational humanist. I've got a penchant for misanthropy and a flair for the obvious. I'm quick with a joke or a light up your smoke, but there's someplace that I'd rather be. I'm Zeitgeisty, pleased to meet me I'm sure. Visit my blog at www.walruscomix.com/zeitgeisty.

Location: Somewhere on the isle of Manhattan...
Looking for: A shining good deed in a weary world...

Airheadgenius

I am a fish out of water - an opinionated cheeky smiling English chick in a land of larger than life Americans. I don't understand the culture. I don't understand asking if we're exclusive. I don't understand this weird practice of decapitating penises. Some days I am definitely MILF material. Other days I feel more like the material on the inside of yer grannys' handbag.

Location: Brooklyn
Looking for: A stunning socialist with a propensity to pick winning lottery numbers

amboabe

I'm a smart ass writer who'll argue your ear off, hold your hand close, and tell you the truth whenever. I'm a fool and a hero, a confessional soul, and lover of life in every conceivably absurd way that it can come. I also paint my toenails.

Location: San Francisco
Looking for: A sail, not an anchor.

spjv840

Slightly neurotic, over-analyzing girl..err, woman, with too much charm for the average person to handle. Has a fondness for red wine, cheap beer and a good time.

Location: The Igloo, Canada
Looking for: Nothing mediocre

Hooksexup Pesronals

in